Frazier vs. Norton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by OBCboxer, Feb 7, 2008.

  1. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    7,949
    Likes Received:
    226
    Someone tell me why this didn't happen, they both fought at the same time. Who would've won if this happened?
     
  2. ChampionsForever

    ChampionsForever ESB VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    1
    This content is protected
     
  3. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    Frazier KO5 Norton
     
  4. Hadrian

    Hadrian Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    4
    yeah, norton was awesome...but he lost to most tip-top heavies he fought. He seemed perfect to give ali fits...but i think frazier would have wilted him..also, i think he was an amazing athlete who happenned into boxing, whereas frazier was a fighter to the bone.
     
  5. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,935
    Likes Received:
    56
    They were stablemates and their management wasn't interesting in putting them in with each other, and they themselves wouldn't have wanted the fight.

    As to the result, Norton tended to crack under pressure and raw power, both of which Frazier brought to the table in spades. I see him breaking down within eight or nine rounds.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55,255
    Likes Received:
    10,345
    It depends when they fought. IMO, Frazier was past his best by 1973, while Norton had plenty from 1973-1976.