Froch limited?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Proud Warrior, Apr 26, 2009.

  1. Proud Warrior

    Proud Warrior Well-Known Member banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    1
    He may be limited but take a look at the last round again. He needed a KO and could of easily panicked and smothered his work, he stood off and picked his shots,that shows a great boxing brain. He was so cool it was untrue. You train to fight 12X3 min rounds and thats wot he did. Credit needs to be given.
     
  2. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,798
    Likes Received:
    3
    He showed good composure, and he is a good fighter. He deserves credit for ithe victory, even though it's clear that Taylor is probably the better fighter.
     
  3. Proud Warrior

    Proud Warrior Well-Known Member banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is the one thing that bothers me on this site,styles make fights. Some like tip tap others like bangers,i like to watch both but when styles meet it makes for the better fights.
     
  4. outthebox

    outthebox Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    10
    what makes me laugh is if that was in the 4th round we'd hear how froch is the next big thing etc blah blah blah. but because it was at the death when he was behind hes not getting the credit he deserves. Either way same outcome.

    im not even a big froch fan either.
     
  5. scilent assasin

    scilent assasin p4p Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    2
    towards the end when taylor was hurt, froch was so calm it was unbelievable his hands were down and was slipping taylors jabs that he was throwing to defend himself and selected his shots very nicely i was impressed
     
  6. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,582
    Likes Received:
    3
    I give him credit for the win but he is still limited.
     
  7. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    17,931
    Likes Received:
    11
    Props to Froch but he won't last long.He is exciting,though.:good
     
  8. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    19,216
    Likes Received:
    2
    I love the way people keep saying 'Taylor is the better fighter' as if being able to be conscious at the end of a fight is in no way relevant to being the 'better fighter'.
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    Froch TKO 12 Taylor

    That sums it up pretty well to me, with regard to who is the better fighter
     
  10. jcrh22

    jcrh22 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Taylor is the better boxer but he was also better than Pavlik. People don't seem to realise that Froch was the one that forced the pace that Taylor couldn't handle and made Taylor fight off the back foot which Taylor didn't want too.

    If Taylor is so much better he would of dictated the fight and fought it at his pace.
     
  11. Boxing in montr

    Boxing in montr Mandatory challenger Full Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    0
    To me, Froch looks like Andrade, with a great chin, just a little more skills and little less pressure. Still, if Taylorhad better stamina, we wouldn't be talking about Carl Froch right now...
     
  12. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    12,737
    Likes Received:
    3,589

    I think at the movement, even when Pavlik lost to Hopkins, I would rate Pavlik over Taylor. Being 2-0 against him is the main reason imo.

    I rate Froch over Taylor also. Just because he beat Taylor. No one was rateing Walcott over Marciano or Conn over Louis because these 2 had to win from behide.

    It does not matter how Froch won, he beat Taylor and thus should be rated over him.