Froch V Kelsser

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by FLINT ISLAND, Dec 13, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    Kessler by wide UD would be my choice.

    Despite Froch's chin I would not rule out a stoppage either.

    Kessler is way too polished for Froch.
     
  2. HOF

    HOF Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,873
    0
    Feb 10, 2008
    Well the Kessler question is the only thing I have against a Froch-Calzaghe showdown at the present time at a catchweight or whatever. I believe Kessler is head and shoulders above the other 168 fighters when looking at the difference in the level of the Froch-Pascal bout compared to the Calzaghe-Kessler bout. It would be great to see Froch beat Kessler purely because it is the one thing that would really shake Calzaghe up but I just don't see it. Froch-Kessler needs to happen as I don't see Bute and Inkin being tempted out of their armchairs - in Bute's case he is frantically trying to avoid getting into the ring with Andrade again, who Kessler toyed with. As for "exposing Kessler's limitiations" as has been posted in this thread, that would require someone with the in and out footwork plus lateral movement of a Calzaghe, and Froch clearly doesn't have that. You can only expose someone's "limitations" if you don't possess them yourself. In Kessler's case he also needs to pull his finger out now he finally has proper hold of the WBA strap. So at present it would be Kessler by wide UD, but I have a funny feeling it will be quite tough to get the various 168 strap holders into unification bouts
     
  3. Rebel-INS

    Rebel-INS Mighty Healthy Full Member

    2,489
    4
    Apr 12, 2008
    Anyone who throws wide, slow punches you can see coming a mile off like Froch will struggle against a fighter like Kessler who has a very good jab, straight right and uppercut.
    I think a comfortable UD for Kessler would be most likely, with Carl definitely going out on his shield.
     
  4. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,384
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    I agree Carl is not fully proven but Kessler certainly is. He has won a title twice and unified and has quite a few defenses. He gave a decent account of himself when in with an elite on top form. Bar the Calzaghe fight he has still barely lost a round in his career despite already having been in over 10 world title bouts. What the hell do you have to do these days to be proven in your book? Excluding Calzaghe no current 168 fighter is more proven than Kessler.

    EDIT: Oh as for the original question Carl should keep well away from Mikkel as its a fight he will almost certainly lose. I can see Carl beating Taylor, Inkin and Bute but I cant see him beating Kessler.
     
  5. srb31079

    srb31079 themarvelmarv Full Member

    714
    0
    Oct 29, 2007
    Froch really will have to tighten up against the higher grade fighters, but he wont so for me Kessler by decision. But Froch will leave a mark or two.
     
  6. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,351
    3
    Nov 4, 2007

    Kessler's greatest ever win is Andrade, need I say more. He was completive early on against Calzaghe, but despite the first few rounds the fight was clearly only going one way. You are right though, the whole division is largely untested at the higher level - including Kessler himself, imo.
     
  7. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,351
    3
    Nov 4, 2007
  8. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,384
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Compare Bute/Andrade to Kessler/Andrade.... need I say more?

    I'd say Keesler is fully tested at normal world level (Andrade, Mundine, Beyer, Lucas etc)... but a bit short at elite level. Seeing as since Joe moved to 175 there are no elites at 168 so Mikkel is in effect fully tested.
     
  9. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
  10. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,351
    3
    Nov 4, 2007

    Exactly my point ;) . Bute is no great shakes but he too beat the guy who is Kessler's greatest ever win. Sure it was ropey at the end with the knockdown but he out boxed the guy before that. Lets just hope that Kessler doesn't plan on fighting yet another tomato can next, another Haussler type character would be desperate.
     
  11. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,384
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Lets be honest it was a bit more than ropey at the end.

    I agree though Kessler need to step it up now and stamp his name all over the division and that can only ever be done by making the important fights.
     
  12. kel

    kel Boxing Addict banned

    5,897
    0
    Jan 20, 2007

    Greatest win Andrade :huh What about stopping Siaca to win his first world title? Then travelling to Australia to dominate Mundine (who was regarded top 5 SMW at the time) then stopping Lucas and Beyer.
     
  13. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Probably the most sensible statement regarding Kessler that I have actually seen :good
     
  14. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I don't want to see it, because I don't want to see Froch get beat before he has had a few big fights on ITV.

    Kessler would be him fairly easily, IMO, not sure if he knocks him out or wins on points though, either way, Froch would be outclassed.
     
  15. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007
    Kessler by 12 round beat down with the possibility of a late rounds stoppage.

    Froch has only faced 1 border line top 15 supper middleweight and that was Pascal, and for 8 rounds he struggled.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.