hagler ~vs~ martinez!!!

he's so good moving in and out with shots that get gets marked up by a labouring slowpoke like Pavlik :roll: he's got decent reflexes but he's always getting hit. he lacks any real cuteness/caginess with his movement and upperbody. fuking biased ******.

have you even seen the Duran fight? he just stood there and poked a jab in his face? hell, Hagler must be a fuking bum then to lose to a guy who just stood there and poked a jab in his face.

for all of Martinez's "trickery and elusiveness", how does he deal with Hagler's trickery and elusiveness? Hagler is no trickster but he's at least four times more technically competent and he most certain has a better defense. why don't you take this into consideration?

 

I did and thats why I picked Hagler to win.

 

yeah im sure your correct :huh

 

kopejh, was Thomas tate one Julian Jackson's best fights ? Didn' Roy KO Tate in 2 ?

I am glad we never saw Jackson vs Jones, what a slaughter that would've been !

 

Julian Jackson did fight a great fighter Mike Mccullam and lost. I don't hold G-mans slaughter of him that much against Jackson already weak legacy. That would be like expecting mugsy bogues to knock out Ron Artest.

Julian Jackson proved he could not finish what he started look at mccallum to prove this. He also showed you he needed be dominated before he knocked you out, like vs Drayton, Herol Grahm. Hey who are all those other KO victims ? Jamican Bartenders were Jackson's oppenents ? Did they give him problems too ?

Yeah Kopejh Jackson destroyed Norris, but hey that was a green norris. Like you would say about Jones one handidly beating a green B Hop

 

Hagler KO in 8. Martinez gives a good fight while it lasts, but prime Hagler has too much in the way of everything.