hatton trainer?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by LJB, Nov 19, 2009.


  1. zfc

    zfc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    91
    May 1, 2009

    Have you really? Your so called superior knowledge isn`t looking good when you predict Hatton beating a proper fighter like Marquez.

    I bet you were one of the morons who thought Hatton would be too big and strong for Pac. :hi:
     
  2. jimcox88

    jimcox88 Active Member Full Member

    1,403
    0
    May 27, 2009
    Go back to Gallagher gym with joe, a back to basics approach might ignite the fire and Gallagher is a cracking trainer
     
  3. Triplesod

    Triplesod Drunk& pissed up on booze Full Member

    2,270
    0
    Jun 23, 2007


    Roach wouldn't take Hatton. He doesn't rate him highly enough to put his concentration on and he wouldn't think there would be any point trying to change the fighter he has become.

    Calzaghi Snr.:hat
     
  4. Triplesod

    Triplesod Drunk& pissed up on booze Full Member

    2,270
    0
    Jun 23, 2007

    You think, Beest? I think "shattered" would be a better word.
     
  5. TheUzi

    TheUzi MISSION INCOMPLETE Full Member

    7,358
    0
    Jul 23, 2008
    Money talks.
     
  6. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    hatton can change. he needs technical adjustments which are easy to do, especially with his vast experience. changing his style is what would be hard.
     
  7. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I still think he has a big ego, albeit a bruised one :good
     
  8. Top Dog

    Top Dog Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,276
    1
    Oct 10, 2006
    Yeah and he stores it in his ass by the look of things
     
  9. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    You mean like moving your head and not leading with your face? Yup real technical skill that.
     
  10. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    I'd hardly describe Urango & Collazo as 'cans'. Not great, but world level nevertheless.
     
  11. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    He does move his head just not enough and when he does his technique in doing so is poor.

    Hatton is a physical talent but his flaw is his terrible technique and total disregard for a gameplan.
     
  12. zfc

    zfc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    91
    May 1, 2009

    Its unbelievable that a few days ago you were saying I was posting like a twat and then you come out with nonsense like this.

    Roach is minted he doesn`t need Hattons money and he doesn`t want to be associated with a fighter like Hatton.

    Roach is well respected in the fight game he`s not known for wasting his time trying to polish one dimensional turds in their 30`s like Hatton.
     
  13. RyDogg123

    RyDogg123 Active Member Full Member

    1,228
    12
    Sep 20, 2009
    One dimensional? HE outboxed the boxer Paulie Malignaggi! Your a tit, you seemingly no **** all about boxing... Have u seen Craig Mcewan? Hes got no talent in my eyes eventho hes british.... HAtton is a two weight world champion held numerous belts at 140 beat good fighters occasional great fighters along the way... is rich as **** can afford any1 or anythin.... If Craig McEwan is a talentless lightmiddle/middleweight he will proove to be and Hatton has achieved these such accolades why wouldnt he waant anythin to do with him?? Your stupid with absolutely no boxing intelliegence!
     
  14. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    zfc,take up some other sport mate coz you know nothing about boxing,try the verbal bull**** championships CHAMP!
     
  15. Top Dog

    Top Dog Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,276
    1
    Oct 10, 2006
    Hold up big man, while I agree with you in general, the reason Roach works with McEwan is because the lad has talent, honestly mate to say he is talentless is too much. He still has lots to learn, but has talent. I dont think Roach would take Hatton on at this stage of his career, 1 or 2 fights left, cant see it, too much to retrain he will reckon, lets be honest Hatton got away with a lot until he came up against the top lads, then got melted, simple as that.:good