hatton v cotto

Cotto smokes Hatton. Close the thread.

 

:thumbsup I can appreciate folks with logic and common sense!
I mean its very obvious that Cotto's resume @ 140 is a bit better than Hattons.

 

:yep :yep :yep :yep

 

Ignoring H2H, as you simply state that Cotto's resume, and achievents at 140 are far superior to Hattons.

On resume, and achievemtns (@140 alone), Hatton ranks above Cotto. Cotto didnt even unify at the weight, and only ever picked up a WBO title. Hatton has been the champion at the weight for 3 years now. Cotto has never been the Champion at 140.

If you want to take it to opponents, the win over Tszyu eclipses anything Cotto did at the weight.

Hatton ranks higher then Cotto at Junior Welter weight, based on achievements, and their resume there.

 

Hatton only chance is at 140 when Cotto was having trouble making weight even so I believe Cotto still had the goods to KO him. He is tougher and a better inside fighter than Hatton. I think Cotto destroys him in either weight.

 

tELL that to someone who doesnt know any better but i KNOW THE FACTS! The win over Tszyu is HIS best fight thus far and does not hold weight over Cottos resume at 140.
Malignaggi,Maussa,Torres and pINTO where all undeafeated before losing to Cotto.Not to mention Victoriano Sosa whom Cotto k.od in 4rds and not even Mayweather could k.o Sosa.Also Cotto beat Randall Bailey in 6rds,Corley(whom Mayweather couldnt k.o)in 5 rds and Abdulaev whom was 15-1 @ the time.

Again Ricky's highlight @ 140 was the win over Kostya,Jose L Castillo,Urango and Maussa(after Cotto kod him) and thats about it.

Its evident that Cottos resume is better and he would destroy Hatton within 7 rds imho.im done:hi:

 

No it is not evident at all, cottos best win is at 147.

 

what are you saing hatton unified the 2 belts wba and ibf then vacated them both after never was undisputed champion at that weight.

hatton has been champion at 140 for 3 yrs but who has he defended agaisnt urango,castillo, and lazcano haha having the ring magazine belt doesnt make you the real champion like nate cambell said that **** is just an award if it was a title he would have been stripted.

get hattons balls out your mouth cotto by ko in under 5

 

What did Cotto do at 140 that Hatton hasn't - to make his resume and achievements there so much greater as you claim?

Out of interest who are your top 15 ATG JWW based on resume and achievement at that weight alone?

 

OK Buddy keep lying to yourself ,your only cheating yourself.
Either way Cotto would steamROLL over Hatton at either weightclass.

 

Cotto has faught better/tougher opponents @ 140 than Hatton bottom line.

 

I Haven't even stated that Hatton would win at 140, and I certainly don't think he would win at 147. Ignorance is not an excuse for stupidity.

I query the fact that you stated that Cotto's resume, and achievements at 140 far outweigh those of Hattons. As yet I'm yet to see any evidence from you that proves that statment correct.

 

You REFUSE to see the evidence due to your mental block but no worries here ,it'll sink in sooner or later.
No disrespect, but you say "Ignorance is not an excuse for stupidity"
well my friend ,funny you mention that when it seems that it is YOU that is ignorant to the ClEAR evidence in these facts,lol!!
Ignorance is bliss my friend.

 

BTW why dont you start up a poll on who has a more impressive resume @ 140 Cotto or Hatton and lets see what the masses think.
Gotta go ~peace

 

10 MELDRICK TAYLOR
9 FRANKIE RANDELL
8 LOUIS KAPLAN
7 ROGER MAYWEATHER
6 JUAN MARTIN COGGI
5 PERNELL WHITAKER
4 KOSTA TSZYU
3 ANTIONIO CERVENTES
2 JULIO CEASER CHAVEZ
1 DUILIO LUI