Haye Wlad...

Come on man how about 134-72=62 didnt they teach u math at school?

 

Revisionist brittards at their finest :rofl In a couple of years they'll say it was a "typical german robbery" or some ****.

 

:deal

every round was close, but wlad took almost all rounds, because he connected more and was aggressive.

haye was wlad's best opponent by far:deal haye is imo a very good fighter, who is just likes the big fights and thats pitty, because i think he would smoke all other guys with highlight knockouts. and i think he could very well ko vitali

 

its americans for you, they make up their own versions of fights, according to them:

Wlad won 12 rounds vs Haye

Ward won 12 rounds vs Froch

Barrera won 12 rounds vs Nas

All finishing 120-108.

If you actually watch any of the fights yourselves you soon realise these americans are full of ****.

 

wlad vs haye was a tactical battle..and wlad won a tactical shut out..its as simple as that..hence why people say (real boxing fans) wlad boxed a masterclass and dominated haye..haye tho did stop trying to win the tactical battle after the 5th and started to rely on a hail mary then he started to look foolish (with his lunging shots)..not any more to say on the issue..haye is a gd boxer..but for some reason he is one inactive **** who takes the easy route (when theres a gd chance he dosnt have to)...

one thing i will add tho..anyone who gave haye more than 2 rounds needs to have their voting rights taken away from them...

 

It wasn't exactly like Wladimir dominated Haye at all. Wladimir won but it wasn't a shut out.

 

Seriously Vitali was winning the fight and Lewis got lucky no one can really denie that just deal with it. I'm not saying that Vitali is better then Lewis but in that fight lewis obviously wasn't.

I mean how dense are you people.

 

I was thinking the same :good:good:good

 

You will also realize that your British fighters got outclassed in these examples. What will you do now? Cry that location was a factor?

 

in all 3 the british fighter lost....but american versions of these fight are that they were all shut-outs...which was not the case in any. It comes from american angolophobia. look at the judges scorecards in the barrera v nas fight, two judges had barerra winning by 3 points. Now if youve never seen that fight, and you had only heard about it on here...then you would assume by the alleged beating Naz got according to jealous americans...that he acually lost 12 rounds to 0. And not by three rounds, as the judges had it. its americans warped versions of history...like the 1812 war where they got chased out of canada and signed to keep the status quo after having their capital building burnt down...yet they claim they 'tied' or even 'won' that war. Like their warped version of ww2....they just make **** up as they go along.

 

Haye tried for the first for or 5 rounds. He got hit with a big shot in the 5th (I think) and he didn't want to know after that. A
part from his little attempt in round twelve.

 

Haye done **** all. Dirrell showed more will to win against Froch and we all know how much you guys **** on that performance.

Whatever way you cut it Wlad was in control for the vast majority of the fight. Haye was the only one hurt (once in the 5th round where Booth admitted they needed to change tactics and once in the 12th after Haye landed one of his only big shots Wlad came back firing and had David retreating to the ropes). Wlad had him running, ducking and diving all over the place and didn't stray from his gameplan at all.

I would call that a domination of sorts.

 

Haye was very close to winning this fight just like Britain was close to ending WWII before the US got involved.

Haye had a puncher's chance after the 4th or 5th round when he started trying to throw huge shots with really no guile, didn't take much for Wlad to see them in advance and react.

Haye was out boxed, out classed and out done end of story

 

Haye won 2 rounds at best, MAB beat clearly Naz 3 points with point deducted for manhandling Naz, MAB showed he is a level above. Ward outclassed Froch everyone agreed on that after the fight but now some are trying to change that fact...

 

nope...the british fighters lost in all three fights...it americans who make them all out to be Calzaghe v Lacy style beatings. which none of them where.