****ing hell Rob, I had my hopes up then. As for your point about needing 150,000 buys to break even on PPV, hopefully this means Sky buck up their ideas and listen to us or scrap PPV all together. Wankers. They best get the Hayemaker deal- I pay over the odds for Sky as it is.
I really hope Sky aint the sole provider of boxing in England :bart Dont particularly like there coverage
Lots of threads about their style, poor presenters etc. It's the producer who calls the shots over the style, content and coverage, his name's Chris Brown. I reckon it would need a change of producer for the style to change at all.
No I think competition could do that. When Setanta came on the seen Sky began to fix up. Before hand people had to email them to show replays. Replays that should be shown in a heartbeat.
this is Dave Coldwells facebook status "after nine hours of meetings, decided to drive back from london.. should be wakin the missus up on my arrival at approx 6am!" so hopefully they were discussing future fights with Sky. Lindsay and Quigley are british champions, Rhodes is looking at title eliminators. Both Watson coudl fight for domestic titles this year Groves and Price are decent attractions on any undercard.
I thought when Sky had Haye in about the PPV fight they would of asked him about the Hayemaker fighters yesterday. Poor from Sky not to mention his fight promotion when they are showing him on PPV. Yes Sky are ruining boxing the fees they charge they would want to do something about that in a recession the prices should be dropping down for this sort of thing. If they continue to charge for fights say £5-£8 tops for the fights they would get more buy rates than what they get like when they had prem plus. It is bad enough when they dont show all the card live and charge you what they charge. The prices of the fights is nothing compared to the price of there football deals.