Depends how you define power. To me, there are two ends of the spectrum and slots in between. You have Bob Foster and Thomas Hearns at one end with their whipping, concussing punches. They aren't strong punches, but carry high velocity due to leverage, speed and a natural technique. At the other end, you have George Foreman and Bennie Briscoe; the punches thrown by these men are not as fast and snapping, but the strength contained will penetrate your guard and physically move you. There are varying levels in between these two, where Joe Louis, Marvin Hagler and Ike Williams belong. Let's say, for the sake of whatever, that Hearns and Foster were '10' and Briscoe and Foreman were '0'. One end represents snap and velocity, the other represents strength and raw power; a '5' is an equal balance of the two. Here's how it would look to me: 10 - Foster, Hearns, Robinson 8 - Williams, R. Lopez, Tyson 6 - Louis, Moore, Arguello 4 - Duran, Hagler, Marciano 2 - Chavez, Galaxy, Olivares 0 - Foreman, Briscoe, Saddler All these punchers are roughly on the same level, though I tend to think the better ones reside from 6-10.
Great post, but i'd have Louis on the level up from Alexis, i reckon he had a fair bit more snap and speed. Arguello didn't have fast hands, but i class Louis not far from Ali for handspeed and snap personally. I think his speed is the most underrated part about him.
Perhaps. I don't really know where Arguello got his one-shot power from - he wasn't that fast or anything. His punches were straight and full of leverage but so were many others' shots and they didn't have the same effect as Arguello's. It's a mystery. Maybe he had just the right balance. Or timing? He might have learned to hit at precisely the right moment.
Schuler was a legitmate top 10 160lber coming into the Hearns fight. He beat tough veteran Sugar Ray Seales, Clint Jackson, Kenny Bristol and most impressively he took the '0' of streaking James Kinchen.
Good point. Arguello neither had the snap of a Hearn's nor the heaviness and thud of a Foreman. Yet as a P4P puncher he ranks at the absolute pinnacle. I definitely see a beautiful delivery and close to textbook perfection on near every punch. Great leverage. It might be more than just timing tho, he sliced Escalera's lip pretty much off as well as other scary deeds. A difficult study this one.
I think that few if any fighters of his weight have matched his power. I could suggest Mickey Walker, Barbados Joe Walcott and the younger Sam Langford.
Hearns retained great power all the way from 147 to 175 and even 190 really. IMO he is absolutely automatic inclusion in the top 5 or 3. I have no problem at all with numero uno. The way he proved his power over so many divisions gives him the advantage over Foster and co IMO. if we stipulate P4P power in a single division it gets closer. Alexis Arguello is another who showed enormous power over a big division span.
the only fight i can think of from memory at middle where hearns power can be questioned is against doug dewitt whom hearns landed flush over and over again and doug slapped his own chin and asked for more.(it may not have quite happened like that but thats how i remember it)
Thast's always going to happen tho. Mannassa tonight pointed out Foster - Finnegan, similar. It can happen. The fascinating thing is DeWitt had never been stopped going into the Hearns fight yet was stopped by a mug next fight in just 3 rounds. Delayed reaction? :smoke
Agreed to a certain extent. He did retain his power all the way from 147lbs to 190lbs, but he was not as consistent with it. His power clearly decreased while moving up, but thats understandable. Hearns was a great puncher, then again he wasn't superman.