Yea I knew that to be honest. Ive had a fair old bit to drink tonight. The worst is, is that, I was looking at the boxing rec resume as well thinking who the hell is this Tim smith guy who Koed him, why have I never heard of him! To be honest I remember watching BCS against Tyson, but I was a little young when he fought Bruno. BCS it is, not Tim smith, you are indeed correct.
Bruno has big power, if Holyfield is not careful it could spell disaster. I think this is a tough fight to pick. Holyfiled could be very inconsistent, but I'd make him a favourite to win by rallying late with a good workrate. Perhaps even a stopage.
overated?are you drunk thats the dumbest statement of the day. he was as tough as tough gets the man is the definition of heart.you should be banned for that statementatsch
Bruno was destroyed in three round by the second version of tyson , That same version of tyson lost to Holyfield by stoppage .. Bruno get a real ass whoopin .. then KO'ed
Worst analysis ever. Tyson had already battered Bruno once. Bruno had one eye, and really didn't want to be there. He would have NONE of that pressure against Holy. I think it would have looked a lot like the McCall fight, except Holy probably would have been able to take advantage of the tiring Bruno, and probably TKO either 11 or 12, either just behind or even on points. Bruno was almost a world class fighter. The slowing down hurt him. He just looked like a machine running with no oil after a while... Always stopped on his feet from memory, chin wasn't bad, just seemed to freeze. Bruno - with the exception of Bowe, Lewis and Tyson - was as good as anyone Holy fought. And better than Moorer IMO. He's got a chance of winning, but I think Holys workrate does the job in the end.