How accurate is BMI?

Discussion in 'Boxing Training' started by Martini643, Apr 25, 2008.


  1. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004
    On most of my friends it seems to be pretty accurate but with me either im sherman klump or it doesnt work right with me. I don't think I could be 175 even if I starved myself
     
  2. MrSmall

    MrSmall Member Full Member

    142
    7
    Jan 2, 2006
    TOTALLY inaccurate.
    It does not take body fat into account.
     
  3. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004

    if its for those who dont exercise the average weight for a male would range from 250-500 pounds these days. i think they just take into account all the small framed 130 pound mayweathers of the US
     
  4. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    The BMI was never meant to judge obesity, so it is completely accurate.

    The problem is simpletons using it when it clearly should not be used.
     
  5. Little_Mac

    Little_Mac Active Member Full Member

    832
    3
    May 18, 2007
    You mean it doesn't take into account muscle mass.
     
  6. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004
    i'll never forget i was going into high school for my physical and the doc told me i was 80 pounds overweight for someone my age yet only wore a size 36 pants and have a big frame. the doctor himself looked like he was 300
     
  7. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Most doctors with a brain will not use the BMI on somebody that does not have a typical build.

    Your highschool doctor was probably just tired and looking forward to his paycheck.
     
  8. Melbourneborn

    Melbourneborn Member Full Member

    350
    0
    Sep 6, 2007
    The BMI is extremely accurate. It is an exact science - it precisely, 100%, calculates your weight per meter squared of height.

    The problem with it however, is it purely measures body mass. It does not consider anomalies such as increased muscle mass. As a rule however, for the 'average joe' - it isn't a bad guide.