No, how could you? If your P4P #1 you have to be the best. Losing to an average fighter will hurt his rating.
I have Calzaghe at NO1, there's no way a win over Diaz will change that on my list (but I would reconsider a change if a stunning first round KO occurs). It really doesn't matter that PacMan fights at 135 for a paper title since Diaz is one of the weakest champions today, awarded a title when Casamayor was stripped, handpicked to lose to a shot Morales (but somehow won a controversial decision) and handpicked now for PacMan. Who's not shot of course, so he should destroy him... anything but an early or first part TKO will be disappointing and stabilize his 2nd place... But don't worry, PacMan will this one in 6, so the no1 remains a tough call... PacMan can be the clear no1 at the end of the year fighting a legitimate LW champ - the Casamayor-Marquez or Campbell-Guzman winner.
Gone a bit quiet hasn't he? What a troll, he hasn't a clue how to compile a credible list & is desperately racking his small brain as we speak trying to save face. Wanker.:yep
co-sign......i'd also like too giggle at this honestly theres no1 you can even make an argument for being #1 aside from pacman.... the closest one would be who?... calzaghe, and he's only beaten one elite fighter?.... 2 if you count kessler (although i wouldnt)..... but i'd personally like for cotto to be #1....but he's #5 tops, so please tell us ...but yeah, i dont think he'd drop down the p4p list any...even if he did lose, because at the least, he's chosing to fight the best fighters out there