calzage is a good fighter but not an all time great and that is where the issues begin.you say calzage was suppose to lose these fights but i'm pretty sure he was always the favorite.his best win comes against an aging hopkins who is 2-3 in his last 5 fights.now he is offered a chance to show some greatness and fight a young lion in pavlik and he declines to fight the old horse.
joe c dosn't fight a 160 pound fighter because he's this and that .. kessler dosn't fight a 160 pound fighter .. oh its ok he has bad management .. what a cheap dirty excuse
:nut What are you talking about? Calzaghe was the favorite and most expected him to do much better than he did.
A myriad of Calzaghe fans predicted that Joe would take BHop out early, or that BHop might win 1 or 2 rounds!
:blood Says the guy with a naked dude on his avatar. Do you imagine the gun is your ***** because its big and hard.
so all the hopkins fans who were on here going on about how bhop would not lose to a white boy ... they all get banned or dont come on here no more?
you need to take your head out of calzaghe's hole... he's a good, possibly great fighter, but he didn't show greatness vs hopkins.. far from it imo. btw, im british also, so i'm not just a 'us hater' as you say, but joe's resume isn't that of an atg, and it's both his own and frank warren's fault. however, such a restricted resume and where most of his fights took place are possibly why he's still undefeated..
i dont have my head up anyones hole...i'm just saying if this dude is suposed to lose to these guys ..it'd be nice for you guys to actually pick the right winner...