Jacobs vs Quillan Stoppage?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by davidmcallister, Dec 6, 2015.

  1. davidmcallister

    davidmcallister Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    343
    Just watched the Danny Jacobs win over Peter Quillan and personally I thought the referee got the stoppage 100% right but the commentator really seemed to take offence at the stoppage!!

    What I saw was Quillan had no legs left and looked out of it and if the referee had let Quillan carry on he would have been brutally KO'd.

    So was the referee right to stop the fight or should he have let Quillan continue?
     
  2. CutThroatFade

    CutThroatFade Rangers FC Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2015
    Messages:
    19,987
    Likes Received:
    32,036
    I thought it was premature but not the worst I've seen. Paulie M focused on the fact that Quillin didn't complain. I think personally he momentarily lost his legs but then seemed to steady himself. If anything he should have given him a standing 8-count when the ropes kept him up.

    Would love to see Eubank Jr vs Jacobs now.
     
  3. Makingweight

    Makingweight Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,039
    Likes Received:
    955
    Quillin didn't complain,would of just taken more punishment his legs were gone.
     
  4. Optimus Dime

    Optimus Dime Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    36
    Jacobs good boxer but not the real golden.. even Korobov got hard done by..
     
  5. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2014
    Messages:
    4,849
    Likes Received:
    2
    Thought it was premature, not the worst I have seen but he was holding eye contact with Jacobs, yes he was in trouble but I felt he should have been given slightly longer.
     
  6. davidmcallister

    davidmcallister Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    343
    If he had been given longer do you think he would have managed to get back into the fight or do you think he would have just been overwhelmed and stopped or KO'd moments after?
     
  7. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    21,934
    Likes Received:
    6,110
    Glad Quillin got stopped.

    Love it when a yank hype-job gets exposed.
     
  8. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    17,760
    Likes Received:
    14,664
    Quillan was absolutely done. The referee was 100% right to stop it.

    Quillan should have gone down and taken a count after that last shot.
     
  9. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2014
    Messages:
    20,458
    Likes Received:
    12,593
    Initially thought it was stopped a little bit early but having reached it it is obvious that Quillin would have lost and not lasted much longer. Plus he never complained.

    No where near as bad as Froch v Groves 1 for instance.
     
  10. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,927
    Likes Received:
    176
    Quillin seemed to get his feet back underneath him after the first heavy shot, but the big right hand that led to the stoppage, rocked him to his boots.

    Had he taken a knee, he could of possibly seen the round out, but nobody can blame the ref for that stoppage.

    Quillin was on drunken legs and could of been seriously hurt.

    Fair stoppage imo.
     
  11. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,519
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Who has been hyping quillin? And how exactly does getting stopped by a fellow world level proffesional boxer with very good power equate to getting 'exposed'? Exposed as what exactly? A human being?
     
  12. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    37,070
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ref bottled it. He's hurt obviously, he can't hide that. You don't stop a fight because the fighter is hurt, especially when they are en elite fighter defending their world title. You stop a fight because the opponent is unable to continue or at risk of being seriously hurt. While hurt, Quillin was moving his head, throwing punches and trying to get back into the fight.
     
  13. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    36,270
    Likes Received:
    33,092
    It looked premature when I watched it live but watching it again today I think Quillin was just saved from getting knocked out, he was seriously hurt and wasn't doing the right things, he didn't clinch or try to hold, it was a mercy stoppage.
     
  14. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,927
    Likes Received:
    176
    I suggest you rewatch the stoppage.

    The right hand that led to the stoppage had completely scrambled Quillins senses, he was struggling to stay upright, and was defenseless.

    Jacobs could have ended Quillins career then and there had it continued.
     
  15. murphman22

    murphman22 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    485
    100% correct. If anything I would ask why he jumped in, in the first place. Surely that is fight over then.