jake lamotta vs ketchel.......

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Sep 3, 2010.

  1. shommel

    shommel Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,118
    Likes Received:
    11
    two ultra tough guys whos winning this war?
     
  2. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    Ketchell, Just as Tough-
    And hit TWICE as hard ! Ketchelo by late stoppage...
     
  3. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,227
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    i can't see ketchel stopping lamotta
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    Lamotta is probably the better boxer of the 2, I'd go with Jake
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,088
    Likes Received:
    3,779
    If anyone at 160lb can floor and stop a prime Jake Lamotta, it's stanley Ketchel. One of the hardest hitters of all time period, with amazing finishing abilities. That said, Lamotta had an iron chin, freakish strength, unlimited Stamina, and very slick underrated defense.
     
  6. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    i agree with all the above, except unlimited stamina...Lamotta seldom
    had to go 15 rounds[3 times]. He ran out of gas in the last Robinson fight.
    Jake knew how to conserve his stamina very well...Would he had been able to go full blast 20 rounds many times as Ketchel did..? and still maintain his chin ? Who knows?
    Ketchel,Battling Nelson, Greb, Henry Armstrong , to me epitomized
    "unlimited stamina", IMO...Good Post S.
     
  7. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Likes Received:
    350
    I can see a very tough fight.
    LaMotta is the much better technical fighter, in that brief clip against Tommy Bell he demonstrated the ability to slip jabs and roll away from right hands very well. In a fifteen round fight, I think LaMotta would gain an early lead using his jab and getting underneath Ketchel's wider dynamite packing swings and going to Ketchel's body. Ketchel demonstates the ability to close distance well against Papke by using his footwork (an asset he is not generally given credit for) and a hard stabbing left jab to the stomach. LaMotta has the tools and the defense to outpoint Ketchel...Ketchel has the toughness and footspeed to close distance and force a real dogfight. Ketchel is one of the best inside fighters on film I've seen, he suffocates opponents similar to Armstrong and hammers them. In a fifteen rounder, LaMotta might hold on against a late surge by Ketchel...In a twenty rounder, Ketchel stops LaMotta!
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,823
    Likes Received:
    51,910
    LaMotta is better technically, but is he better technically on the inside? I really don't think he is. Ketchel was a shark on the inside, tearing of pieces of pain in short, bit sized punches that only a truly adept opponent would be able to smother. Robinson, who had nothing like Ketchel's experience inside, found ways of leathering Jake to the body with meaty broadsides. What would Ketchel do? I think he would beat a definitive tattoo and I think LaMotta would be his masterpiece. Ketchel could stop LaMotta and I would favour him pretty heavily to beat him.
     
  9. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,241
    Likes Received:
    158
    LaMotta may take the decision in 10 or 15 round bouts. If it's for 20 rounds, Ketchel probably has the edge.

    Based on film I don't see Ketchel being better than LaMotta at all but I admit that his best fights were never filmed.
     
  10. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,241
    Likes Received:
    158
    I would say so. Technically there aren't too many better infighters than LaMotta from what I've seen.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,823
    Likes Received:
    51,910
    Perhaps so. I do know that Ketchel was able to find room and pitch to land serious punches inspite of his being wrestled, pressured and smothered to a far greater degree than anything Jake had to cope with. To put it another way, he is a more proven in-fighting technician against the type of pressure LaMotta will bring.
     
  12. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Likes Received:
    350
    Robinson was a surgeon with his ability for placement...Ketchel is Jack the Ripper.
     
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    I like that...Jack The Ripper
    all who saw Ketchel in most of his knockout fights,called him the greatest middleweight they ever saw...Virtually all...He kod 49 opponents in 64 bouts, and I ,for one who have never seen film of Ketchel,except for his last bout with Papke, where he allegedly broke a hand, must take the
    written opinions of contemporaries,who extolled him to the skies...
    A born killer....
     
  14. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Likes Received:
    350
    Thanks Burt.

    I really don't think Ketchel looks bad against Papke at all...I know it is only one film, but you can see Ketchel NEVER lets his back touch the ropes, smothers an opponent's offense inside similar to what Duran and Armstrong used to do...reacted quickly demonstrating good footwork moving towards or away from an opponent...That's off the top of my head, haven't seen it for awhile. Ketchel isn't pretty but hedoes what he does...and he is more than effective at it.
     
  15. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,402
    Likes Received:
    1,281
    In a dog fight like this Ted Spoon must go with the wilder animal.

    LaMotta is going to tough it out for the majority, if not for the entirety of the bout, but considering their respective styles, Ketchel's jack-in-the-box slugging, and underrated inside trickery would prove hard even for LaMotta to digest.

    Stanley's not going anywhere either, and he's the one with the bigger jaws.

    Contrary to a legend bathed in blood and knockouts, Ketchel was a very smart and unusual operator - that inherent unorthodoxy that all the true greats have to plague opposition.

    LaMotta has the substance indulge in some sustained trading, but the ending will not be pretty. A premier-fencer is needed to pull the plug on Ketchel, LaMotta cannot count on toughness.