Maybe in your house, but the majority (vast) had calzaghe winning. doesnt matter how much :| :| :| :| :| :| :| you do about it, it happened.
Your argument doesn't really work. You think Hatton 'got respect' for beating Urango, Collazo and Castillo? He got those fights as a name in the US only because he had already beaten Kostya Tszyu, who was a consensus top three P4P at the time. Which he did in Manchester, while promoted by Frank Warren. Doesn't work, see.
I was talking about the Hopkins-calzaghe decision that got to you so much bud, dont know where Jones arrows kessler by ricochet gets in there but nevermind. Keep taking the tablets.
Journeyman doesn't do you justice mate, you're a ****ing idiot. A noob of the **** variety, if I'm not mistaken. Come back when you have a clue. Or don't. :hi:
He would definitely go 0-3 against those three IMO. That's having nothing against Joe, he's a very good fighter, I just think those three are a higher class of boxer. Jones in particular would rout Calzaghe, that would be a mismatch. Jones's speed and skills would be far too much for Joe.
yet you completely skim over the summer of 2002 when a deal was put in place for calzaghe-hopkins then ol' bernie misplaced his balls. funny that.
He is a slapper. His style is ridiculous. It is unique. I think he would have a good chance at beating any SMW ever - including RJJ. But really - Joe's style should more or less be banned from boxing. It is grotesque.
Joe beats old Hopkins among his other wins, yet Tarver is ahead of him on your list by beating an old Jones and getting hammered by an old Hopkins. Johnson is ahead of him by going 1-1-1 with Woods, 1-1 with Tarver and beating an old Jones? How in the world does that make sense?