Who do you honestly think won? Take into account there are a lot of Froch nut huggers on here when veiwing the poles.
So translated your saying "who do you think honestly won and take into account most ppl picked froch including judges,all papers and sports sites and all must be froch nut huggers, I have a hidden agenda and probally am a calzaghe fan or dirrell fan and just cannot accept maybe its me thats wrong and not 95% of other people, i feel i have some inferiotiy complex and feel the need to pull down this fighter in lots of threads over last week or so because i feel the attention should be going towards which ever fighter it is i prefer"
Froch has Polish ancestory on his fathers side, not sure what Poles we're viewing apart from that though...
Or maybe Froch just won. Go to other boxing sites, they seem to think the same too. Anyway, I scored it 116-114. The first round was a nothing round so clearly even. Round ten saw Johnson land about 3 BIG shots and Froch land several flurries. I scored it even but looking back maybe I should have scored it for Froch.
115-113 Froch People tend to see what they want. If you were to swop the two performances round cases for Froch winning would be laughed off. On the other hand if Johnson had done what Froch did ppl would be claiming it a lot wider than 115-113.
I had it close, couldn't decide on some of the middle rounds, but I could imagine Johnson winning. I'm glad Froch won, wanted to see him fight Ward in the final, but those scores were too wide.
118-110 Froch If you think that Glenn won then you were probably drunk. Every single person on press row scored it for Froch. In most rounds Glenn scored 2 or fewer power punches to the head. In some rounds he had none. That wasn't even close to a winning performance.