I had it 7-5 for Burns. He did the cleaner work and he took most of the early rounds which was important...and really surprising to be honest since I expected Katsidis to swarm him early. The judges scoring were a bit wide with their cards but they did give the nod to the right man on the night.
if you want to be taken seriously on these boards, i'd shut up if i were you. you can't score a fight for ****.
im scottish like ricky burns and thought it was a very close fight , i had it 115-114 burns although the round i scored a draw many think burns won that round (11)
LOL NO. Your scoring is a joke. Enzo had it bang on... have you watched boxing before?! serious question
I scored it 6-6 but i gave Kats the 4th round so i can see 7-5 Burns. No Robbery but 117-111 is a strange card.
I think your rhetoric(not only the Jock part) shows how seriously you deserve to be taken here,i.e not at all.:bart
He's from London, dude. Essentially that means that he was Australian last night. Probably watched the fight in Walkabout while drinking Fosters straight from the barrell. Ignorant ***** needs a slap and he scores fights like old people **** - Not very well.
Although scoring is subjective and as i will readily admit i can score fights badly, that scorecard is shocking.