katsidis robbed?

I had it 7-5 for Burns. He did the cleaner work and he took most of the early rounds which was important...and really surprising to be honest since I expected Katsidis to swarm him early.

The judges scoring were a bit wide with their cards but they did give the nod to the right man on the night.

 

biased? nah. just stupid and unable to score a fight properly. :good

 

This.


....and he's biased as well.:rofl

 

if you want to be taken seriously on these boards, i'd shut up if i were you. you can't score a fight for ****.

 

it's not assassin you dick head!!

 

im scottish like ricky burns and thought it was a very close fight , i had it 115-114 burns although the round i scored a draw many think burns won that round (11)

 

LOL Clear win by at least 8 rounds to 4, if not, more

 

LOL NO. Your scoring is a joke. Enzo had it bang on... have you watched boxing before?! serious question

 

I scored it 6-6 but i gave Kats the 4th round so i can see 7-5 Burns. No Robbery but 117-111 is a strange card.

 

I think your rhetoric(not only the Jock part) shows how seriously you deserve to be taken here,i.e not at all.:bart

 

You're a ****in liability!

 

He's from London, dude.

Essentially that means that he was Australian last night. Probably watched the fight in Walkabout while drinking Fosters straight from the barrell.

Ignorant ***** needs a slap and he scores fights like old people **** - Not very well.

 

Although scoring is subjective and as i will readily admit i can score fights badly, that scorecard is shocking.