****Kirks Championships 2017 ****

My record is incorrect again

 

I should have 28 KO

 

Zeuge UD Rodriguez UD Rose UD Maruta TKO

 

Don't yell at me and force me to do something if all you're gonna do is go back and correct all my god damn errors...!!! I are is not perfect...!!!

 

So how many more wins do you have to have to surpass someone with less loses (from not picking all the fights?)

 

It's just Wins minus Losses.

 

Knockouts is the tie-breaker...!!! Example:

Person A) 29-19 10 KO's
Person B) 30-20 9 KO's

 

@PinoyProdigy please confirm, but in the past with that specific example you are incorrect. KOs are tiebreakers when the record is the same. In this example, the wins minus losses are the same, however, Person B would be ranked higher due to more wins.

 

Example in the actual rankings:

16. lepinthehood 40-20 (20 KO)
guerfi ud, quigley tko, linares tko douglas UD,
17. matt007 36-16 (21 KO)
Douglas UD

 

Actually this is what I thought happened.

 

Guess I'm having trouble wrapping my head around it
for example
9. Limerickbox 41-14 (16 KO)
10. Robney 45-23 (20 KO) (more wins more KO's)
11. David B 44-22 (20 KO) (more wins more KO's)
12. rorschach51 45-24 (22 KO) (more wins more KO's)

I'm not understanding how I would surpass #9 if I already have more wins and KO's, same as #8
8. nellybc 48-21 (23 KO)

Who also has more loses than #9, so I'm asking how many more wins would 45-24 (22 KO's) need to surpass 41-14 (16 KO's) already have 4 more than. Do I need to be 8 up like Nelly before having a better record?

 

So it's like this:

8. Nellybc: plus 27, 48 wins, 23 KO
9. Limerickbox: plus 27, 41 wins, 16 KO
10. Robney: plus 22, 45 wins, 20 KO
11. David B: plus 22, 44 wins, 20 KO
12. rorschach51: plus 21, 45 wins, 23 KO

Order is by plus score (wins - losses), 1st tiebreak is # of wins, 2nd by # of KOs. So you just need to gain plus 1 on Robney and David B to overtake them.