Langford v Hopkins

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Feb 12, 2011.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,185
    53,631
    Feb 11, 2005
    Since ESB is a copy-cat league, I thought this one was worth posting. Thoughts, insight? Assume both are relatively prime relative to the 160-170 range. 12 rounds here.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    Interesting match up.

    Forcing the fight to take place at 160 would give Hopkins the best chance, because there would be the issue of Langford making weight.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,185
    53,631
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sam was 160 or abouts when he beat Joe Jeanette, Jim Barry and Jim Fynn. That's the Langford I'm looking for, not the fat one.
     
  4. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    14
    Dec 2, 2008
    This one is just too hard for me to call. I think Langford would be a bad style match for Bernard Hopkins. Though, I could see Hopkins winning a close decision. It would be a very interesting fight.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    Depends on the rules and how the fighters adapt to it. I think Hopkins would be less troubled with the more loose rules in Langford´s time than Langford would have with the more restricting rules in Hopkins´. Langford would be one of the few would could knock Hopkins out. 12 rounds would help Hopkins. From what I´ve seen Hopkins has the better defence and this may be the decider here.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hopkins UD he can outbox Langford from the outside and stop Langford walking him down with his defense and movement.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,185
    53,631
    Feb 11, 2005
    So, today I have learned that decent middleweight puncher will trouble Langford more than giant 6-7, 245 lb. heavyweight who stops nearly every opponent he faces and has lost only a handful of rounds in his career.

    ESB Classic, you are truly enlightening!
     
  8. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    If you read this out of this and the other Langfrod thread you are the enlightened one here.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,185
    53,631
    Feb 11, 2005
    Not every poster, of course, but yes the trend in sentiment is there among a significant group.
     
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Sam at 175-185 pounds wasn't fat. He was extremely broad, and compact!

    Hopkins is essentially a defensive minded counter puncher with a great chin, and decent jab who likes to mix in questionable tactics when the ref isn't looking. However power was not his thing, and Hopkins had some trouble with speedy boxers. I think Langford probably wins a decision or knocks Hopkins out, depending on Hopkins decision to trade.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am not sure who has picked him over Klitschko but picked him to loose to Hopkins.
     
  12. sandy mac

    sandy mac Active Member Full Member

    892
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    Sam Langford is somewhere as second or third most carreeer knockouts. Behind the great Archie Moore. He knocked out heavyweights! Sometimes weighing not much more than 160 to 175 lbs! Fought blind for the later part of his carreer! If b-hop ran Sam would catch him. I b-hop traded Sam would knock him out.Langford was not bad defensively . A bit ahead of his time actually. Was a devestating puncher This guy fought the best black fighters of his era. Was avoided by Jack Johnson and the white heavyweights of his era, including Jack Dempsey. No wat could Hopkins ever beat The great Langford.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,185
    53,631
    Feb 11, 2005
    It's not even picking Hopkins over Langford, but some are insinuating Langford would have more trouble with Hopkins than Vitali, Janitor for one (tho I have much respect for his historical knowledge even if I disagree with the conclusions he draws from it).
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    Well, I don´t think Vitali is in the same league as Hopkins as a fighter. He is bigger that´s the only thing he has going for him.