Linear champions

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KiwiCC, Feb 13, 2011.

  1. KiwiCC

    KiwiCC Grasshopper Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone know the actual linear heavyweight champions (I mean the guy that beat the guy that beat the guy) from Bob Fitzsimmons on? Plus, I'm not sure how you do it when someone like Marciano retires undefeated or when a guy is stripped of his title, like Ali. I get a bit lost, particularly since Ali retired.
     
  2. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    178
  3. KiwiCC

    KiwiCC Grasshopper Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly what I was after. Thanks.
     
  4. eslubin

    eslubin Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    0
    The man who beat the man formula has been debunked over and over as too defective to be useful. It's how you get someone like Dariusz Michalczewski rated as the "real" champ over Roy Jones which is a joke to anyone trying to be honest. To people trying to manipulate facts into a myth is another story. So if the champion beats someone, then sits on the title and/or faces a bunch of nobodies, how is he possibly champion?

    The man who beat the man scenario ends for heavyweights in 1905 when Jeff retired. Boxing is a lot of politics and the man who has the "championship" whatever that may be, has been proven over and over to not necessarily be the best boxer in the world.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndqOzDUUYsI[/ame]