Matt Skelton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MasterCalzaghe, Jun 1, 2008.


  1. I see from ESB's front page David Haye has been downplaying Matt Skelton and as much as I love Haye & respect him he's full of **** on this one because top 10 ranked or not Skelton is a beast and would give Haye issues. Slow, boring as he may be Skelton is still a tank. In fact Skelton has never been KO'd.
    As I said props to Haye and I do actually see him winning a decision over 12 rounds but certainly not a KO, he would be just too fast for Matt at the end of the day though when all is said and done but he shouldn't chat so much **** about a boxer who though old would give him a heck of a fight!!!

    Skelton gave Chagaev the fight of his life recently and I'd love to see him in the ring vs Wlad or Valuev personally just for wow factor of it all though that said Wlad would decimate him in 6; Wlad is just too accurate and powerful...would still be an interesting fight though.

    I know Peter hasn't yet picked Skelton or Fraudley for July but lets hope he picks Fraudly because truth be told I simply don't see him Ko'ing Skelton who I see as being a VERY dangerous foe for Peter though he might win via decision through activity or Don King *ahem*.........;)

    Bottom line: Skelton may be slow, boring and technically **** but he hits like a mule and takes punches like a rhino and whether he fights Haye or Peter I would be intrigued to see how it unfolds. Not excited but intrigued and not at all shocked if he won either.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    well if Haye really does fight someone more difficult than Skelton then i'm all for it.

    going from fightnews top 16

    1. Wlad Klitshcko
    2. Samuel Peter
    3. Ruslan Chagaev
    4. Nikolai Valuev
    5. Tony Thompson
    6. Alexander Povetkin
    7. Sultan Ibragimov
    8. Alexander Dimitrenko
    9. Oleg Maskaev
    10. Shannon Briggs
    11. Vladimir Virchis
    12. Juan Carlos Gomez
    13. Andrew Golota
    14. Chris Arreola
    15. John Ruiz
    16. Hasim Rahman
     
  3. ghostlybadge

    ghostlybadge Punch Drunk Full Member

    1,984
    80
    Dec 9, 2007
    we should throw matt skelton in a MMA ring with kimbo
     
  4. spiderricco

    spiderricco Member Full Member

    321
    24
    Feb 25, 2006
    Excellent post, it's about time The Quietman got a little more respect around here.:hi:
     
  5. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    Povetkin Vs Haye would be a good star and after that a title shot against Peter!
     
  6. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Since Hayes victory over Enzo he has been walking and talking like he defeated a Muhammad Ali:nut

    Skelton would be a good start at heavy.
    Haye Skelton i believe is a 50/50 fight, Skelton is big, robust and has good power and stamina, all the ingrediants to beat Haye.

    I agree Mawoodhouse that Ruiz would beat Haye if they fought.
     
  7. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    Haye says his fight will be with a top ten heavy, but who's top ten is he picking from?

    There won't be alot of avialable top ten fighters to pick from.


    Ruiz and Golota are two good tough fights, but I think Haye will fight someone who is known, but is no longer top ten, like Rahman.
     
  8. kgs83

    kgs83 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,868
    0
    Jan 14, 2008
    Totally disagree, why fight Skelton, what is there to gain??.....But fighting higher ranked fighters he gets to the top quicker and yes will be fighting better opposition.

    Skelton isn't the greatest fighter on earth, he is a big lump (who can box tho). But theres far better fights for Haye, just because he said no to Skelton you say his full of ****.

    Thats BS and weird a Calzaghe fan can say that....i'm a big JC fan, but why didn't he fight Froch when he fought a poor Manfredo?? Double standards eh.