Mijares judging WTF?!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nalian, Feb 16, 2008.


  1. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    9-3 Mijares

    120-108 is absurd
     
  2. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    116-112...120-108 is corruption
     
  3. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    It HAD to be a clerical error. It HAD to be.....
     
  4. Kegsy

    Kegsy Lights Out Full Member

    20,268
    1
    Aug 9, 2006
    I had it 117-111 Mijares.
    Dunno wat that judge was thinkin with a shutout for Navarro.
     
  5. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Imagine a two yard run on 3rd and 7 resulting in a first down. How long would those refs be left in the the NFL?

    Or since this is ESB, letting a striker walk 20 yards offsides with no flag going up... in any case, if Buffer didn't read it wrong, or some flunky didn't fail 3rd grade arithmetic, that judge needs to GO. NOW.
     
  6. BoxingKangaroo

    BoxingKangaroo Active Member Full Member

    899
    0
    Jun 3, 2007
    it i quite odviously a mix up i hope............
     
  7. Steel Kelly

    Steel Kelly Active Member Full Member

    532
    1
    Jan 2, 2008
    Buffer got it right allright, Tucker has a track record of bizarre scorecards (Marquez V Barrera) and should be fired immediately and banned for life from ever attending a prize fight again! It was a good fight and Navarro was tough but was outclassed by Mijares by at least 5 rounds. Mijares V Montiel?
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    i haven't watched the fight yet but is there 1 round in the entire fight that Navarro won EXTREMLY clearly?

    and is there 1 round in the entire fight that Mijares won EXTREMELY clearly?

    if the answer is yes to both then 120-108 makes no sense, regardless of who it was given to.
     
  9. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    that was the worst card in history
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,432
    81,444
    Nov 30, 2006
    There was no clear Navarro round. There were up to three you could give him.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,432
    81,444
    Nov 30, 2006
    huh? :huh
     
  12. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,432
    81,444
    Nov 30, 2006
    Whew. I thought you meant undercard, I was gearing up for a roshambo. :yep
     
  14. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    sorry it was unclear. and roshambo would have been fitting if i indeed said that the undercard was bad. they clearly weren't:D
     
  15. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    Mijares won by 3-4 points, but even if Doug Tucker's 120-108 card read in Mijares's favor it would smell of corruption. Neither fighter dominated all 12, much less Navarro.

    One thing I don't understand is that Larry Merchant has access to the fighters post-fight, but the judges are always allowed to sneak out through the back door without having to explain anything.

    And yet they wonder why boxing loses fans.