Criteria is not how large the stage was at which a robbery or perceived robbery happened for example Holy v Lewis on ppv for the HW championship of the world or DLH v Trinidad which was a hugely anticipated fight. The question is which fights no matter how isnignifacant(as long as they were on TV)would you say had decisions where the loser won most clearly as in won like 9 or more rounds. Lara vs Williams is an example
Palomino vs Azevedo comes to mind. I had it 8 or 9 rounds for Azevedo after 10. A couple maybe even. Palomino only clearly won the last 5 rounds. Both commentators had stated the first round they gave Palomino was 11. Yet on one card he won 10-5. Impossible you could get that score. I have never been able to score it with Palomino winning under any circumstances
The 4th fight between Emile Griffith and Luis Rodriguez. In rounds I had it 9-3-3 for Rodriguez and one of those even rounds I had scored for Rodriguez only for the ref to take a point away from Luis for a low blow or some infraction. Just can't make a case for Griffith in this one. Just my opinion.
Kovalev didnt win more than 8 rounds by any stretch of the imagination this doesnt qualify. I asked for fights that were not even competitive were the loser looked like he won 9 or more out of 12
George Foreman - Axel Schulz Tim Bradley - Diego Chaves Brandon Rios - Richard Abril Oscar De La Hoya - Ike Quartey Oscar De La Hoya - Felix Sturm Shane Mosley - Oscar De La Hoya II Mauricio Herrera - Jose Benavidez Mauricio Herrera - Mike Anchondo
Emanuel Augustus - Soren Sondergaard Tyson Cave - Oscar Escandon Maurice Hooker - Darleys Perez Rocky Martinez - Orlando Salido II Keita Obara - Walter Castillo Adrian Granados - Kermit Cintron Zolani Tete - Roberto Domingo Sosa Joel Casamayor - Jose Armando Santa Cruz