Pac & Clottey II

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by fighter86, Mar 12, 2010.

  1. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,062
    Likes Received:
    62
    I bet there is a rematch clause in this fight ...this could be another way to avoid fighting Mayweather and continuing to using whatever drugs there taking. Either way Pac is still going to collect 15 plus mil for both fights.
    Trust me they don't want no part of Mayweather.
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23
    it will only happen if clottey wins
     
  3. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    19,533
    Likes Received:
    1
    same reason why floyd has a rematch clause with mosley? :yep
     
  4. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,062
    Likes Received:
    62

    Cute lol
     
  5. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1
    Mackey (Oklahoma)


    what happens if Clottey wins is there gonna be a rematch or does go on to face the Mayweather Mosley winner
    Dan Rafael
    (3:27 PM)


    There is no rematch clause for Pac-Clottey so we will have to see how it plays out. Obviously, if Clottey wins there will be another big fight in his future.



    Fail.
     
  6. Twirdman

    Twirdman Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why the hell would you think theres a rematch clause, especially if Pac wins. I mean there might be a rematch clause if Pac loses but unlikely if he wins. Clottey simply isn't a big enough draw and doesn't pull enough weight to demand one. And even if Pac wanted to avoid Mayweather rematching Clottey is a poor way of doing it; he'd be much better of going back to 140. Especially since if he really wanted to he could use the excuse Ring is making me fight at 140 if I want to keep the lineal title.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    LOL another dumb ass hater
     
  8. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Messages:
    32,127
    Likes Received:
    41
    :lol:
     
  9. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Messages:
    6,638
    Likes Received:
    2
    TS owned
     
  10. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    8,176
    Likes Received:
    1
    Schaefer said there is no rematch clause.
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    [yt]6y2OVGwn60Y[/yt]
     
  12. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    8,176
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thanks for the video.:good

    Strange for Schaefer to come out and say there wasn't one if there is.:huh
     
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    its not strange at all since Shaefer is a known liar
     
  14. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    51,687
    Likes Received:
    24
    youre a moron