Peter was robbed

ROBBED??? the fight was awful...not sure how u came up with peter winning alot of those rds but he did NOT get robbed...that is just another ridiculous thread on ESB...robbed is when you actually clearly win a fight and get screwed...peter did jack **** the whole fight...neither guy earned the win but chambers did more

 

both horrible excuses for HW champs and contenders.

 

Peters. The same Peters that was going to save the heavyweight division be the king of boxing for years to come. The same Peters that got knocked down several times by Mcline? The same Peters that quit against An old out of boxing for 4 years Vitali ? The same peters that says "WHO NEX" WHEN BEATING A "B" LEVEL FIGHTER. I am shocked that he could get robbed by just the virtue of his past acomplishments they should have given him the win no matter what he did in the ring last night. He is the new savior of boxing is he not.

Peter got robbed. Of his sences.

 

Most of you guys here on ESB don't even know what a robbery is...

I dunno why some people here are even wasting their time in this thread, especially torwards a noob with 200 posts. These kinds of threads happen after every single fight.

 

neither where active. Chambers won the fight with his jab and a few right hands.

 

I domý like that fat ass chamber i think he needs to fight at lightheavy, but Peter deserves to lose more that guy was horrible last night, and pretty out of shape.

 

Peter landed 19% of his punches, and that might have been generous.

 

I saw the fight as a close one, i have to admit a lot of the shots thrown and landed had no pepper on them at all... I just realised where that fight and the condition of both boxers took me to .. I was back in 1984.. that could have been Greg Page and John Tate.. both just managing to sling shot clusters from the hip, they each have ability , but girth prevents them from doing that little bit extra.. If they showed more discipline in the kitchen , they would have been 18 pounds lighter and a hundred punches more entertaining.. PERIOD !!

 

This fight was the worst I have seen in a good while.

****ing chumps.

 

Peter did not land one meaningful punch the whole fight.

He also did not throw enough as the punch stats showed after the fight.

I had it 7-3 for Chambers.

Peter is essentially now a gatekeeper in the Heavyweight Division.

 

He didn't outwork Peter at all. Peter threw almost 200 more punches, and they weren't the pitty patty jabs that Chambers was throwing. Unfortunately for Peter, after the first few rounds, Chambers was actually landing and Peter wasn't. I had it 96-94 Chambers, but I don't think there was any reasonable way you could have scored the fight for Peter. He went like 4 rounds in a row without landing a decent punch.

 

You don't watch much boxing, do you?

 

Step down son, you are a newbie here.

I saw what I saw, and it was garbage.

Samuel Peter gives boxing a black eye, that big lump comes in like that.. disgraceful to say the least.

A full time professional boxer.. heck, I am in much better shape than Peter and I am not close to a full time pro.

 

atleast chambers can box... hes just fat and has no power....

peter is fat and cant box

 

Chamber's won, But it's like passing school on the report card's with a D.
(U still move on, But U still don't know ****)