he had the look of a guy whos just come to realise that hes not going to ammount to any thing much in the sport
wasnt craig watson known as the guy who exposed khans chin in the amatuers? anyways matty hatton isnt that bad he just isnt aggresive coupled with low boxing skills and with athletic talent...the worst mix for a guy who wont come foreward doesnt have the talent to be quick or to punch and still doesnt have a jab to at least make his non agresive style count. has anyone seen lee meager...very similar pumps the softest jab right infron tof them throwing a jab. least spinks entertains the crowd a bit, these guys couldnt lift bosworths jockstrap i swear. it kinda pisses me off that there are guy sfar more talented and overall better than meager and matty hatton yet hatton would sell out a arena prolly.
Its a shame, but he will probably still earn more money than better fighters by continuing to fight no-marks on the underbill of his brother's big fights. He's English title level material, if even that.
His very limited and lucky to have Ricky as his brother. If he was not Rickys brother no one would bother with him and he would be fighting on small regional shows.
More Hatton bashing.Yes he is a very average boxer but if you were given the opportunity to make more money in a profession whether or not you were good or if it was on the back of your brother would you take it?Answer yes Why not just talk about the guys fight instead of jealous personal rants as usual:roll: Ps well done Craig Watson
How the fck is that Hatton bashing ? Matt will never be on the same level as Ricky and you know that. The only reason he gets on the big undercards is because of Ricky. If that is Hatton bashing then stick it up your punani. It is not Hatton bashing but a simple true statement. If David Haye had a boxing brother called Matt Haye and he was as limited as Matt then I would be saying the same thing if he got to fight on all his brothers big fight cards.