It's hard to argue the depth of that era. Anyone else feeling a resurgence happening? There are some really good heavyweights in the division right now.
good post. Disagree about the rating of Hank Griffin, he was nothing special, but the rest is reasonable. McCoy, I'd have higher and for sure Denver Ed Martin should be in there. Also another "Denver Ed", Smith this time, should be in any top twenty from the 1890's.
McCoy was a middleweight, not a light heavyweight. Why mention the draws with Ryan and not the win over the same? He also had the better of the bout with Choynski that was a pre-arranged draw. Steve O'Donnell was one of the most skilled and talented heavyweights of the decade, but he was too weak mentally to be a fighter. Jim Hall held a win over Tommy Ryan?
Just quoting your authoritative knowledge as the greatest most perfect boxing ****yst to have ever lived. go smoke some :rasta:rasta:rasta:rasta
There really was not a light heavyweight division pre 1900. McCoy was about 5'11 1/2 with a 76 in reach. A puncher type with mobility and skills he beat much heavier men. His best weight was above 160.
I don't think McCoy's best weight was above 160. He was described as fat at 165 pounds vs Jim Stewart in 1908. He made 158 pounds for O'Brien in 1904. I think 156-158 pounds was about right for him.
I think it is fair to say that from the Ruhlin fight in 1898 to the Corbett fiasco in 1900, McCoy was a serious player in the heavyweight division.
Too bad McCoy and Fitz never met in a real fight, some time in 1898 or 1899. Now, if Fitz lands clean and flush, he wins by KO, obviously, but that's far from certain that he could land such punch if the Kid were in top shape.The reverse result is also a possibility, it's not like Fitz was unknockoutable.
He usually got tagged when he came into the fight careless. He wouldn't be against Fitz. He's the more skillful and clever of the two (both in offense and defense), faster reflexes and hands, quicker feet, and he learned Fitz' short-distance punching technique to perfection. They were both very tricky, probably the Kid has advantage even in this department (despite him being very humble in his reminiscences about Fitz). So that Fitz' only chance is to land the KO, and he has a good chance to do that, but I'd probably have bet on the Kid to outpoint Bob.
That's a very interesting opinion. I would have thought that if Maher could get him on ***** street, then Fitz would surely trap him? But I wouldn't be bullish about it either.
I don't know what you talking about. Maher had slightly the better of the fourth round of the fight, but most reporters didn't think McCoy was in any trouble, even less so on ***** street.
Fitz had a tremendous ability to recuperate from a blow. From February 1890 to December 1905, a near 14 year period, Fitz had 49 recorded fights. Only Jeffries knocked him out and his resume of who he meet was stacked with punches. Some feel the fight he lost ( Hall ) in 1890 was fixed, so it's possible he went 18 years with only on man stopping him. That is impressive.
That's not the reason why I think the fight would be won by McCoy on points. I have no doubt the Kid could KO Fitz (but the reverse result has higher probability, Fitz by KO), but we'd probably see the usual more cautious version of McCoy in such bout, and him winning on points.