Presscot vs Maidana

With that chin? I doubt it. Prescott stare will wet Khan's panties and submit to his Khanqueror. :bbb

 

Look, when you make a prediction, you look for the most likely and sensible outcome. In this case, a Maidana win is the most likely outcome. Styles, skills, power, accomplishements and resume all point to this outcome. Looking at Breidis Prescott as a fighter and what he has achieved, and comparing that to Marcos Maidana as a fighter, and his achievements, it's pretty clear who would win on paper.

You're right, anything can happen in a fight, but you don't really take that into consideration when assessing a fight on paper. I mean, it's pretty clear that Pacquiao is going to beat Mosley, even though like you said, anything can happen, that doesn't really apply when predicting a fight like this. The most likely outcome is what it is, if you want to take a shot in the dark, then fine. Just at least suggest something to back it up with, rather than just....'anything can happen'.

 

John Presscot. Expert jab will prove too much.

 

Ok then. How do you explain Douglas vs Tyson? At least with Prescott and Maidana, they have a similar opponent in Khan. Prescott destroyed Khan and Khan beat Maidana. And don't use the excuse of styles make fights or Khan is weight drained at 135 blabla because we all know the reason he got KTFO was because of that shaky chin and backing up straight up.

So using your logic, how do you explain Tyson vs Douglas. When Tyson is a straight killer and youngest undisputed heavyweight champ that is viewed as unbeatable yet got beat by an unknown in Douglas.

See the pattern with Prescott and Khan? Only this time Khan is not really on Mike Tyson's level because Tyson was the complete package. Khan only has fast hands.

 

Catchweight at 288.

 

What I mean is, there was absolutely no logical reason to pick Douglas over Tyson. Tyson was in his prime, destroying people left right and centre, and Douglas was out of shape, struggling with b-level guys. There was no sensible or logical reason to pick him to win. That is why, when he did win, it was the biggest upset of all time. Just because he beat Tyson doesn't mean there was any reason to pick him beforehand based on nothing.

 

Much better explanation. But I still think Prescott is a better and accurate puncher than Maidana. Maidans may have proven himself more because of his wars with Ortiz/Khan/Morales.

That's why I'm still picking Prescott to beat Khan again.

Just look at Vernon Forrest vs Mayorga? It don't make no damn sense right lol. How the **** did Mayorga beat Forrest? When Forrest is one of the best pound for pound at that time and whooping Mosley easily.

I think it is all mental and Forrest was mentally beaten by Mayo. I feel the same way with Prescott and Khan. Khan will never forget that embarrasing 1st round KO.

 

haye's next.

 

shiznit!?!?
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

you ****ing dick, you talk some **** don't you, comparing mike tyson with maidana

 

the guy has 30 wins... 27 kos

he has knocked out everyone but 3 opponents

how the **** is that not a huge puncher? :rofl:rofl


i guess if someone makes $500,000 a year , thats really not much money, because lebron james makes 50 million a year.

keep up the great intellect
:good

 

I agree that Prescott would probably knock Khan out again but Maidana beats Prescott. Styles make fights. Maidana's style is a good counter to Prescott's. Also, Prescott tends to fade after round 4 and Maidana goes hard until about the 10th so I see Maidana wearing Prescott down and winning a decision or late KO.