Prime Whitaker v. Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by the_churn, Jul 26, 2008.

  1. the_churn

    the_churn Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    451
    Likes Received:
    0
    At welter and in prime for both parties, how do you all think Whitaker v. Mayweather would have turned out?
     
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    16,031
    Likes Received:
    6
    Better to make this at 135 IMO, since 147 wasn't either fighter's prime weight.

    In any case, I would take Whitaker. At 147, I believe the fight is a bit closer than at 135.
     
  3. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    4
    Whitaker clear UD
     
  4. the_churn

    the_churn Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah. Good point. I stand corrected.
     
  5. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,055
    Likes Received:
    4
    I've always thought Whitaker 7-5.
     
  6. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,565
    Likes Received:
    11
    Whitaker UD 9-3 at any weight. Although at the lower weights i could be closer I think.
     
  7. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    Mayweather for me by SD - he is seriously under-rated by many on here. Just because he is an arsehole doesn't take anything away from his ability as a fighter.
     
  8. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,479
    Likes Received:
    12
    Again? Whitaker UD something between 9-3 and 7-5 in rounds.
     
  9. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    4
    And than you have tools such as Fitzgerald who overrate the hell out of him by picking him over the likes of Leonard and Hearns
     
  10. Small Print

    Small Print All Lies Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    3
    It'd be a very tactical fight with probably 2 punches being landed all night.

    I'll probably get some slack for this, but I'll go for a close Mayweather UD due to his height and reach advantages and (by the looks of it) more powerful punches.
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Whitaker UD.
     
  12. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    27,199
    Likes Received:
    101
    Whitaker holds certain stylistic advantages over Mayweather, and matches Mayweather's strengths. So how does Floyd win?
     
  13. Random1

    Random1 Guest

    I agree on tactical. Both guys would get frustrated before long, who would have the mental edge to fight through it? I don't know if Mayweather's ever had a really low connect rate, so I guess we wouldn't know how he'd handle it. I think I'd take Whitaker though either way, but very close.
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    I don't see why the **** not!!

    Basically, Floyd has been in with pretty much everyone (Mosley, Cotto excepted) and has emerged without a mark on him on every occasion.

    It takes an exceptional fighter to do that :deal
     
  15. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    16,031
    Likes Received:
    6
    The worst fighter that either Whitaker or Mayweather could ever face would be Tommy Hearns. Whitaker IMO is the greater fighter, but Hearns would beat him H2H because it's a horrible style matchup due to Hearns great skill, power, and most of all size. He would beat both Mayweather and Whitaker.