Pulev vs Spinks

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by uncletermite, Sep 6, 2015.

  1. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    28,283
    Likes Received:
    469
    :good
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    pulev is a joke. why is he being mentioned alongside spinks again (either spinks).
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,177
    Pulev has one top class victory against Thompson, it was a quality victory that and I'd say it made him worthy of a title shot.

    However beating Thompson isn't quite beating Holmes, twice.

    One punch can change it but Spinks has the speed and footwork to keep out of reach of Pulev and is by far the most skilled. So unless Pulev lands a hail Mary I pick Spinks on points.
     
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    how is a victory over a 40something, who never won anything of note, worthy of a title shot?
    add to this, pulev was unable to keep up/box with tony until tony gassed out.

    Put these two together - how is this a quality victory? its not remotely one!

    this is the sign of a joke - a prime fighter being beaten by a 40something such that they have to wait for them to gass in order to win.

    Tony is obviously a competent boxer though, hes not crud - its simply this is his worst ever form.
     
  5. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    22,077
    Likes Received:
    16,732
    spinks would kill Pulev, you better not be saying otherwise Herol :nono
     
  6. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    344
    M. Spinks easily (another ****ey type fight but easier-considering Pulev can't punch)
     
  7. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    24,281
    Likes Received:
    18,022
    Pulev is a decent contender....it,s a shame that he fought such a stupid fight against WK!!
     
  8. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    19,297
    Likes Received:
    7,048
    What do you think he should have done differently?
     
  9. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    24,281
    Likes Received:
    18,022
    He should have used his boxing skills , moving like he did against Ustinov, using his great left jab.
    it would have been a much better fight
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,177
    Because Pulev and Thompson were both bonafide top 10 boxers.

    Pulev outboxed Thompson for a very clear victory further underlining his position as a top contender.

    Wlad had beaten most everyone else and Pulev found himself very highly ranked.

    Few questioned his lofty ranking at the time.
     
  11. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    344

    - Holmes was much more younger than Thompson.
    - Thompson wasn't top class victory especially Thompson is a neverbeen and he never beat only one good fighter.
    - One punch can change(Tyson-Botha,Foreman-Moorer) when a fighter isn't featherfisted but Pulev.
    never was a hard-puncher.Pinaeta-similar sized and fat like Pulev- (Chagaev's first round ko victim) is better than Pulev.
     
  12. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    344
    Very bad answer.Ustinov is a fat slow unskilled cherry-picker he never beat only one decent fighter.
     
  13. lbarrow

    lbarrow Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    145
    Is this a joke? Michael spinks would beat him as easy as he would beat my little sister.different league he would do to pulev what he did to ****ey ram home shots from all angles all night til he stops pulev late. No one can take the amount of shots spinks would land on pulev.
     
  14. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,204
    Likes Received:
    93
    If expect Spinks to win and possibly wreck Pulev
     
  15. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2015
    Messages:
    4,436
    Likes Received:
    44

    And what is spinks going to hurt him with?Spinks was an awkard fighter but that means little if the other guy has skills enough to walk thru you.The only reason why spinks is in the HW picture is he STOLE 2 wins over Holmes and beat a shot C00ney..Pulev is 6'4 250 pounds of decent ability and tons of amateur experience...are you telling me a unproven 212 pounder who was demolished by Tyson is a huge mismatch here?He never even weighed 212 prior to Tyson.:roll: