Originally Posted by Baileys_tunes castillos shot...... and he was never that good to start off with.He cant hit that hard, he has no effect on fighters with his petty punches. Khans a better fighter. castillos acheived more but it dont mean hes better. Khan would beat him. Khan hasnt got a glass jaw so i cant see castillo hurting khan with his punches, hes not a big puncher.. This here is from the British forum, in relation to a Jose Luis Castillo v Amir Khan argument. Check out the highlighted bit above. WTF:nut
Originally Posted by MGUNZ48 PBF wins at 47, Hearns would not be able to hit him. No one else can. Hearns never had a great chin, and was weak in long fights at 47. PBF would probably stop him late. he wasnt serious, or atleast i hope he wasnt
Didn't you know - 48 KO's from 56 wins means that your a feather fisted weasel. The idiot who said that has probably seen only the last 15 seconds of the Hatton fight, and didn't see the two epics between El Terrible and Chico. Also, getting decked by a guy with a 30% KO ratio means you are the equal of James Toney in the chin department.
Some people! One that really did make me laugh was the Ray Robinson thread - decked ten times. Well, in a modern 50 fight career, that is poor, but when you have had 200 fights, ten visits to the canvas isn't that bad. By pro-rata, that is comparable to the likes of Joe Calzaghe!
Take into account the level of competition the man faced; 10 times is great. Ray Robinson could take a punch.
Some clown on our forum. As I have said, they probably only saw the ten count on BBC news from the Hatton fight.