Rate the organisations...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SmackDaBum, Dec 9, 2015.

  1. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,191
    Likes Received:
    1,715
    After WBC letting Wilder do whatever he wants, or IBF stripping Fury for rematch the former champ, how do you rank the belts now?

    1. WBA
    2. WBO.

    3. WBC


    ---

    4. IBO
    5. IBF

    ?
     
  2. Limerickbox

    Limerickbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    12,181
    Likes Received:
    4,190
    They're all terrible.
     
  3. The Smoking Man

    The Smoking Man Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2015
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    4
    I would have wba number due to there nume rous belta and leave ward go almost 7 years without a mandatory. Right now I'd rate them

    1.WBO
    2.wba
    3.ibf
    4.wbc

    Unfortunetly the ibf in the fury incident followed there rules to the letter of the law which made them look silly and stupid and they should change them rules, however there not as bad as the wbc who make up the rules as they go along to suit american and mexican fighters
     
  4. StealthUppercut

    StealthUppercut Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    3
    WBO is arguably the most credible organisation at this point.
     
  5. The Smoking Man

    The Smoking Man Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2015
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    4
    Yup
     
  6. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    6,407
    Likes Received:
    5,543
    These organizations have no chin. NONE.
     
  7. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    WBA is by far the worst just by having multiple titlists.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    4,029
    wba is 1st if you ignore the lesser belts it hands out which everyone does.



    then wbc

    then ibf


    then some degree lower wbo, still trying to fully shake off its unrecognised status in the 90s.


    then the others that no one recognises that appear to have been created on a scrabble board with letter WTF IBO
     
  9. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    7,005
    Likes Received:
    2,071
    Worst, by far, IBF. They should no longer be recognized as a credible organization. It's quite possibly the worst move by an organization in hw boxing history.

    WBA next, because their rankings are horrible and because of the "super" champion bs.

    WBO's rankings are simply abysmal, so they are the next worst.

    WBC, for all their flaws, are shamefully probably the best of the organizations. I reserve the right to change my mind on that depending on how the Wilder situation goes. But right now, its more Wilder's fault for anything than WBC. Povetkin has only been mandatory for about 7 months. That's not an unusual time to give to a champ for any organization. And their ratings are much better than WBA or WBO, much more in line with my top 10.
     
  10. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Messages:
    5,191
    Likes Received:
    1,715
    What about IBO then, think they have now might closed the gap to the "big four"?
     
  11. Rampage88

    Rampage88 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    3
    1. Wbo
    2. Ibf
    3. Wbc
    4. Wba
     
  12. kasabian19

    kasabian19 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    999
    Likes Received:
    363
    I always rated it: WBC, IBF, WBA, WBO - but now i'd go for WBO, WBA, WBC, IBF.
     
  13. Rampage88

    Rampage88 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    3
    All of them have ****e rankings. At least the WBO have one champ per weight, don't recognise the WBA regular world title as a real world title and don't allow unifications between that and their champ, which are rules they stick by. IBF **** rankings like the others but at least they enforce mandatory fights and even though I believe Fury should not be stripped at least they stick to their rules.
    WBC and WBA make it up as they go along, to see where the most money is and the WBA shamelessly try to have 2 champs per weight.
     
  14. YesMySon

    YesMySon Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,997
    Likes Received:
    13
     
  15. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2014
    Messages:
    24,640
    Likes Received:
    18,438
    The WBA will have THREE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONS in a couple weeks. There's Fury, and Chagaev and the winner of Ortiz-Jennings.

    They are the worst and the most confusing. They have SIX HEAVYWEIGHTS scheduled for title fights. Fury vs. Wlad. Ortiz vs. Jennings. Chagaev vs. Browne.

    That's ONE organization. With three world heavyweight champions. Not three organizations mucking things up. ONE organization mucking things up.