Replace Dempsey with Toney

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Nov 10, 2016.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,240
    Sep 15, 2009
    If James Toney was there that night against Willard, how would he have done?

    Would he have successfully defended his title against the same men Dempsey did?

    Would he have lost to Tunney the way Dempsey did?

    Could Toney have bettered the resume of Dempsey?
     
  2. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,312
    19,580
    Jun 25, 2014
    I doubt James Toney would've beaten Jess Willard to be honest with you. Toney was a counterpuncher, primarily. And Toney wasn't a particularly busy puncher.

    Willard likely outpoints Toney over 10 or 12 rounds, whatever it was sheduled for.
     
    fistfighter, mcvey and reznick like this.
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,000
    28,015
    Feb 15, 2006
    Toney's thin resume against genuinely elite heavyweights, makes it difficult to make particularly bold predictions for him here.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  4. mostobviousalt

    mostobviousalt Active Member banned Full Member

    519
    103
    Jun 4, 2016
    Luckily Willard ain't one.
     
    mrkoolkevin and Seamus like this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,000
    28,015
    Feb 15, 2006
    He was the lineal heavyweight champion.

    You can't get much more elite than that!
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Do you consider old Foreman and Moorer of the 1990s in the same favourable light as you do Jess Willard?
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,248
    53,749
    Feb 11, 2005
    And Burns and Spinks and Briggs...
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    I guess janitor rates Burns
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,000
    28,015
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would consider them to be elite fighters of the era for sure.

    They might not ever have been the best active fighter, but they legitimately got to the top of the pile.
     
    mcvey and louis54 like this.
  10. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004

    Technically, Burns was never the lineal champion. He never beat the man, who beat the man.

    Moorer, Old Foreman and Briggs were technically Lineal champions. However, by this time, particularly after old Foreman openly fought less than the best, the media had no longer considered there to be one champion. In fact a Mike Tyson fight or even a Holyfield, Bowe or Lewis fight was as big or bigger payday. Therefore, this was one of the few periods where the lineal title was devalued (Like the Burns era) and it was not as big a prize as when Willard held it.

    Spinks definitely should be considered as much as anyone. He beat an aging Holmes, but still a Holmes that was 10 times as good as the version who was competitive in the 90s. Who else from the time was capable of beating that version of Holmes? Cooney, Witherspoon, Berbick, Bonecrusher Smith, Bugner? OUtside of Spinks I cant see anyone doing it until Tyson came along. And even Tyson is in no way guaranteed to beat that version of Holmes.

    With all this being said, although i think Toney would be the underdog vs willard and there is no way he wins as impressively, some of the other fights might be interesting if hedoes get past willard. Toney vs Carpentier should have Toney winning well. Toney vs Gibbons would be an absolute all time great fight. Toney vs Firpo could very easily turn into a Toney masterclass. Toney might start favourite against Brennan and Miske. And an older Toney vs Tunney, you would think would see Toney giving Tunney more trouble than Dempsey did, though Tunney would still be favourite. Toney Sharkey might be a tough fight. I cant see Toney pulling out the KO, but would be certainly interesting.

    All in all, while it is unlikely, it is definitely possible that Toney finishes with a better win loss record than Dempsey had.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, in the other thread, you said :

    I'm not sure what you mean they "should never have picked up a title in the 90s" when they were LINEAR champions ...... and it turns out you think "they legitimately got to the top of the pile" and were "elite fighters of the era".

    They were legit, we agree.
    I just disagree on the "should never have ..." statement.
    To say someone should never have been champion appears to undermine their legitimacy, imo.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Y'all sleepin on my boy T-Fire
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,240
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm saying Toney would better his resume.

    He'd never have been knocked out by Flynn and would have fought those Jack ducked.

    The Tunney fight is hard to call.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Is Toney allowed his steroids ?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,240
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah, wouldn't want him fighting with a bum shoulder now.