Exactly, the fight had barely begun. That cut ruined it all. I seriously saw a victory for Charr, until the blood started running and I thought "There's your luck, Klitschko".
I wouldnt go that far. Not that Charr couldnt have won, but still a bit early to say I think. But we were defnitely getting a good fight.
When I saw that Manuel Charr didn't give a **** about Klitschko's punches. I saw it in every single round. Klitschko would have tired out and a rematch will prove it.
I look forward to seeing more from Charr. That wasn't a grueling, punishing loss that will hurt him as a fighter. He should come back strong from this now
The cheeky comments aren't cute anymore. Charr didn't do anything other than stare at Vitali in the 1st round. Chisora did a much better job against Vitali. Charr is cab driver material. Here's how Charr should be graded: Vitali looked like **** and still dominated Charr.
^ You should watch the fight again. Vitali scored points, but did not "dominate" in any other way. He didn't hurt charr even one time, with an actual punch. - Even the KD wasn't actually a KD. Vitali MISSED with his right, and then pulled Charr down with his arm. I'm so sorry to burst your bubble, but if you actually watch the fight (slo-mo helps, but is not necessary) you will see this clearly. As for "meaningful" punches, after you get past the first round, in which Charr was trying to read Vitali & playing it very safe, the two men landed about equally. Most of what Vitali threw were light, pitter patter shots that landed on Charr's gloves. Charr, on the other hand, tagged Vitali on his face quite a few times. Really, you should actually watch the fight again, without Vitali's balls in front of your eyes.
On a truthful note, Don Owens should get Vitlai's balls out from in front of his eyes, and actually watch the fight again. :nut