Robberies of 2009

Sturm-Gevor.
Funeka-Guzman.

 

Dilks/Adamu
Collazo/Berto
Froch/Dirrell

It's been the year of the robbery.

 

I still think the term is thrown around too readily,even away from the GF

Anyway

Funeka/Campbell

 

Campbell/Funeka was a good example of a 'close' robbery. By that I mean the score was close but it was absolutely clear Funeka won enough rounds. They weren't even close rounds.

 

Collazo-Berto wasn't a robbery IMO (I scored it for Collazo btw)

 

Yeah 8-4 in rounds IIRC.One of the easier fights to score

 

Martinez-Cintron.

Won by stoppage, won on points and still didn't win the fight.

 

Neither Collazo-Berto or Funeka-Campbell was a robbery altough I did go against the judges.

Except some clear ones mentioned there weren't clear highway robbery decisions.

 

And by DQ.

 

Funeka/Campbell definitely was. Watch that fight and tell me how many rounds Funeka didn't win clearly. It's not whether the fight is close numerically its about the rounds that could have been swing rounds and jack **** of Funeka's could of been given to Campbell unless you have severe brain injuries.

 

I agree, I had it for Collazo but it was a 1 or 2 round fight.

 

Funeka won 6 rounds clearly.The middleones.

Campbell clearly won the first 2 and the last 2 with 2 of them being 10-8.

That alone makes it hard to call it a robbery.

Might aswell name Erdei-Fragomeni,Maludrottu-Munroe,Williams-Martinez,Diaz-Malignaggi I,etc.

 

Diaz-Paulie "looked" worse than it was because of that 118-110 card.

 

So? That leaves enough rounds for Funeka and they are all CLEAR. Funeka was outthrowing him, outboxing him, outlanding him in all the other rounds.