Sports Network in administration?.......

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by brown bomber, Apr 30, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,856
    Likes Received:
    17
    Rumour? Any truth.....
     
  2. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    19,216
    Likes Received:
    2
    Daily Mail says so.

    The business that owes Calzaghe 2 million quid has gone into administration, but Frank Warren Promotions that now controls Khan, the Olympians, etc seems to be going along fine :think
     
  3. Charles187

    Charles187 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dissolved 21/04/09

    Tried to post companies house link but it wont work
     
  4. cityofgod

    cityofgod Worcester warrior Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Calzaghe is bummed then.
     
  5. MIK1000

    MIK1000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    1
    hold on, isn't sports network just the name of Warren's promotional company?
     
  6. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't the mystical difference between `Sports Network` and `Frank Warren Promotions` the bone of contention in Setanta's lawsuit against Warren?
     
  7. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    8,597
    Likes Received:
    0
    Warrens done this to avoid paying Calzaghe his dues:nut
     
  8. teessider

    teessider Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    0
    This seems dodgey, warren is a ****! end of!
     
  9. Tuffnutz

    Tuffnutz ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,433
    Likes Received:
    2
    Warren should be made to pay Calzaghe no matter what. :yep
     
  10. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    28,342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Warren has jsut done this so that to get out of paying Calzaghe any cash.
     
  11. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.britishboxing.net/news_3769-Setanta-wants-millions-from-Warren.html

    "Setanta Sports announced in April that they had signed an 'exclusive' deal with Warren to show his boxers, including Joe Calzaghe. Amir Khan was still under contract with ITV at that time, but the broadcaster expected him to join them once that expired in the summer.

    In the interim, Setanta Sports then signed a deal with David Haye's new Hayemaker Boxing outfit which left Warren 'very angry' (see BBN news archive). They also agreed to still show Calzaghe's November fight with Roy Jones Jr, despite the Welshman leaving Warren and going solo - resulting in more court action.

    Warren then announced a three-year deal with Sky Sports which begins tonight with a PPV event featuring Amir Khan and Alex Arthur v Nicky Cook.

    To the layman, this seemed to directly contradict the contract announced earlier in the year, leaving many people puzzled and Setanta looking embarrassed. I requested a statement on the matter from Setanta Sports' PR people but, unusually, didn't receive any acknowledgement.

    When Boxing News dealt reported the Sky deal in their issue of 15th August, they wrote: "Warren did reveal, however, that the Sky deal covers 'all Frank Warren fighters' exclusively, rather than all 'Sports Network' fighters. He was coy about the difference between the two"."
     
  12. Chinny

    Chinny Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    1
    If this is true then this tops anything Warren has ever done. Until it is confirmed for sure that JC doesn't get his cash then I won't say anymore.
     
  13. Tuffnutz

    Tuffnutz ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,433
    Likes Received:
    2
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    It most certainly is that easy.

    Most developers these days carry out each project under a different company name.... say Gary Neville became a developer, you might see (on the Companies House list of firms):

    Gary Neville Properties
    Gery Neville Ventures
    GN Properties
    Neville Manchester 2006
    Neville Sheffield 2009

    All with the same directors.... that way, if one of them fails, the only thing that is lost is the assets tied up within that particular company..... rather than the group as a whole.

    Plenty of demolition firms (mine included) buy the machines, then sell them for £1 to the director who takes ownership of them under a different company. Those are then leased back to the main company for an appropriate rate per week.

    If the demo firm goes under, the machines remain the property of the director rather than going into the hands of the receiver.

    Whilst not ethical.... it is much more widely practised these days because so many companies renege on their agreements - people not paying lease charges etc, so a perfectly good company could go under because of some **** refusing to pay their bill. When the assets get divvied up, the debtor might only have to pay a proportion of the original cost.... everyone is a winner, bar the poor sod who has lost everything!
     
  15. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cheers for that.

    In other words, Calzaghe and Setanta are ****ed. :lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.