Super 6 question

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by D_knowsboxing, Oct 9, 2009.

  1. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    1
    Who do you feel absolutely should NOT be in this tourny? Who in the tourny has no feasible reason to be there???

    In my opinion, it is JT. He is on a SHARP decline in his career. He doesn't train and the cowardly lion has more courage than him. The tin man has more heart.
     
  2. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    44,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    AA is pretty much unproven at 168. Why not him or did you just start out to hate on Taylor? Taylor was seconds away from being the WBC 168 champ. What has AA done at 168? :-(
     
  3. killa

    killa Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    :patsch Your saying that the same guy who was brutally Koed by Kelly Pavlik and took an immediate rematch with him, the same guy who went through the wringer in the second half of his first fight with Bernard Hopkins and wanted to redeem himself in a rematch he easily could have punked out on and fought some mandatory is a heartless coward? He never quit in a fight and the fights he loss ultimately came down to his stamina letting him down so when he got caught(by two big punchers in Pavlik and Froch) he was done.

    This is boxing, not some video game :nono
     
  4. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    44,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yep. Seems more like a Taylor hate thread than a "Super 6 question". :-( I figured it was probably an AA supporter, hence my response. :yep
     
  5. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    24,813
    Likes Received:
    20
    no one has no feasible reason to be there, they all bring something thats why they were chosen, but if i had to take someone out its Dirrell, i don't think he's cooked yet, just not ready enough for this level and i think it might be detrimental to his career
     
  6. dishwaser

    dishwaser Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,152
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think all of them add a bit of variety. AA should be there, Froch and Kessler. Out of the other three, you could have had Bika, Bute, Green etc instead of either of them.
     
  8. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,284
    Likes Received:
    0
    there's no reason why any of the 6 'shouldnt' win.. all I can tell u is that froch sure as hell wont.
     
  9. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23
    Dirrell

    what has he done?
     
  10. Finn73

    Finn73 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    3,322
    Likes Received:
    0
    If someone is unproven and doesn't belong into the sixpack, it is Dirrell. Bute should've joined the tournament instead, but as far as I know he demanded too much money...correct me, if I'm wrong.

    JT has lost to some decent opposition. That can happen if you take the risk to fight good fighters, you know. I still see him as the clear favorite against Abraham (and I'm saying this as one of his biggest fans!). JT is all wrong for AA, he's too big, has a big reach advantage, better boxing skills, is quicker and has more overall talent.

    BUT: One thing - and you can't take that away from Abraham - is that he has an iron will and is very determined if he has to. Oh, and he's the hardest hitting fighter in the tournament.
     
  11. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,005
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think thats easily handed to Kessler...without a doubt.

    Abraham is a hard puncher at MW...but SMW is a different story. It took him 9 rounds to put away his last opponent...and went to a UD against a no name that was ready to go. The point is he doesnt have the killer instinct nor the extremely raw power to end someone in ONE shot. AA power has been overrated since his fight with Miranda.

    Kessler to me has the hardest punch.
    Then Froch
    Then AA
    Then Taylor
    And I think Ward
    And Dirrell...maybe Id switch the last two...not sure.
     
  12. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    7
    Great post! I can see exactly what your saying, but Dirrell could pull this off and win the damn thing.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    82,426
    Likes Received:
    1,478
    I think Dirrell. although he has decent attributes he hasn't beaten even anyone of Miranda's quality.

    He has a chance due to his style but Ward deserves a shot as a talented American star who has a lofty WBC ranking, but I'd rather have seen Bute in than Dirrell.
     
  14. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,152
    Likes Received:
    1
    Bute will be out there on his own, the WBO champ will do his own thing. The winner of the Super 6 should be Ring Champ at the end.
     
  15. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    5,986
    Likes Received:
    1

    Bute wasn't even invited because Showtime weren't convincing of his balls to fight the best in the world away from home, after he refused a very substantial offer to fight Froch in England