The Unbeatable Paul Williams ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Z_OhYaDy5k&feature=related

 

it's very naaive to think williams is unbeatable but it's pretty common immediately after a fight for people to go overboard.

after saying that, there aren't many fighters we wouldn't like to fight him.

 

In fairness, he said he just had a bad night against Quintana, and seeing as he smashed him in one round in the rematch, I tend to believe him. Also, he deserves a lot more credit than he got for beating margarito, and at 147 I don't think there is anyone out there to beat him.

But he's clearly not unbeatable.

 

Rubber Match with Quintana. Quintana by UD.

 

i agree.

but saying he had a "bad night" - and having one again - can change a fighter's career pretty fast.

i'm really hoping someone like cotto or mosley will have a crack at him because williams deserves to be a mainstream fighter, and i'm not convinced that beating winky well will do that.

mosley's my bet.

 

yo everyone already knows that you dont like pw.... threads like this are a waste of bandwidth

 

...and everyone knows that you do like williams....so why don't you guys go head to head?

 

:rofl

I love that Pavlik v Zertuche KO.

 

the guy has been outboxed by carlos quintana, the last thing he can be called is unbeatable.

 

Nah, you see the Gods work it out with a special formula. Your nut-hugging rating here on ESB tells you whether it was a bad night or not. For example:

Cotto - nut-hugging density = 100, therefore when he loses it was a bad night and his opponent was wearing knuckle-dusters

Pavlik - nut-hugging density = 0, therefore when he loses it was because he's pure ****, and should go back to fighting in gypsy bare-knuckle events in youngstown's redneck circles

Williams - nut-hugging density lately = 80, therefore when he lost to Quintana it was just a bad night

 

Personally, I think Quintana could beat him in a third fight.

Quintana is an extremely underrated fighter.