Tito v winky 2000

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TIGEREDGE, Mar 26, 2009.

  1. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    33
    this fight would of been much different IMO. tito was fat and faded in 2005 thats why winky dominated

    i fancy tito
     
  2. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,935
    Likes Received:
    100
    It's hard to rest a dominant performance like that entirely on the shoulders of being "fat and faded." A fighter generally doesn't dominate with such ease unless there's a stylistic factor in there as well.

    On top of that, Winky wasn't at his peak anymore either. He was showing slight signs of slipping even before he fought Mosley the first time.

    IMO Winky takes him anytime.
     
  3. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    13,685
    Likes Received:
    350
    Tito has always been vulnerable down the middle, and that is where Winky would always be attacking him.
     
  4. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    12,760
    Likes Received:
    2
    Tito is my all time fave but I have to agree with this...Nightmare of a matchup for any version of Tito..
     
  5. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,620
    Likes Received:
    33
    don't get me wrong, winkys style is wrong for tito but i still reckon that he could squeeze out a decision against him. vargas and harry simon could