Alexander last 3 fights have been Witter, Urango & Kotelnik Khans Kotelnik, Salita & Malignaggi Plus Devon held two belts & is undefeated THIS A ****ING RANKING NOT WHO IS BETTER U DUMB****
I think its a decent list but i dont work under the A beat B and B beat C way of thinking, if you consider the two things (resume and accomplishments) that this list is based on i feel no question Froch should be higher.
Froch should be top 10 and Khan should be included. How you can have Bradley 14th and Alexander 21st but not list Khan is beyond me.
If he beats Pascal I'll be happy to see him in the top 10. But I just can't see him take this decision if he doesn't school him completely. If it's close they will give to Pascal because he fights at home and he has more future
He got a gift against Kotelnik you DUMB****. He beat a shot Junior Witter you DUMB**** Now Jog on you *****:deal
King if this is ranking then im pretty sure Taylor,Pascal,Dirrell, AA is better than Kessler,Bika,Green
You mean Hopkins? Well Donare hasn't beaten a legit top fighter in years until yesterday, so if past achievements count on that basis Hopkins could be easily top5.
Froch is 1-1 this year, donaire 3-0. I give Donaire a better 2010 than Froch. However, Froch's resume overall has better names particularly from 2007-2009 (e.g., Pascal, Dirrell, Taylor) but I also put a lot of weight on dominance (Donaire dominated almost all if not all his fights from 2007-2009).
look at my comment BB I asked the guy why did he put Donaire so high. He should not be top 10 for me. He has the abilities but not the resume