Trinidad Or Hoya - P4P

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, May 26, 2009.

  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,973
    Likes Received:
    13,342
    The more fights I watch and the more I study their records the more I lean towards Trinidad.

    Oscar may have been flashier and far more popular, but he really did take a lot of Trinidad's left overs. I don't know if that was the point, building towards their massive fight, but eh'. Trinidad fought and beat the following fighters before Hoya.

    Camacho, Vargas, Campas, Mayorga and Oba Carr. In my opinion he fought better versions of all of these fights. Campas was 56-0, Vargas was undefeated and not damaged goods. Camacho was still a very decent fighter. Mayorga's chin hadn't been broken and Carr, well, Trinidad stopped him while he was undefeated and Hoya did so as well in far less impressive fashion.

    There's also the fact that Trinidad had far far more impressive accomplishments at MW then Hoya could ever dream of.

    No dodgy decisions except the Hoya fight. Quartey and Sturm both spring to mind and the crap cards in the Mayweather fight as well. More decesive wins in general.

    And Trinidad rose in weight nearly from where Hoya did. He didn't even mature into a full fledged WW until he had been fighting for 3 years or so.

    So, thoughts?
     
  2. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    100
    Na.

    You see, very little of DLH's legacy rests on fights with the likes of Mayorga, Campas, Camacho or Carr. Vargas was a significant win but the rest were simply 'filler' for DLH.

    DLH gets my vote because he actually fought a fantastic array of fighters at welterweight, something Trinidad didn't do. DLH faced a still excellent Whitaker, Quartey and Mosley and Felix faced who? Utterly shot versions of Whitaker and Camacho, as well as prime versions of Carr and Campas. Simply not in the same league.

    DLH furthermore, wasn't even a natural welterweight for mine. He did his best work and looked his most impressive at 135/140. Despite that he still managed imo to beat Trinidad and Mosley in the rematch, whilst beating a roided up shape of his life Vargas in better fashion and he arguably beat Whitaker and Quartey too (had him losing by a point to Pea and had the Quartey fight a draw).

    Sure, Sturm battered him and easily defeated him, but DLH was never a middleweight and so I don't hold that loss against him much.

    If you have Tito beating Oscar you could possibly mount a case, but without it, Trinidad doesn't have a leg to stand on in the argument.
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,579
    Likes Received:
    21,302
    Hoya..clearly but not by much.
     
  4. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,935
    Likes Received:
    100
    Hoya for me as well.
     
  5. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    60,376
    Likes Received:
    242
    Love them both, But De La Hoya is that dude...
    (besides winning the fight against, IMO. he notched himself an ATG career)

    Maybe proving that sometimes fighting top comp, is all that matters.
     
  6. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    3,815
    Likes Received:
    25
    I hate to say it, but I think De La Hoya has to be rated higher.