Usyk Defend IBF ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by octane, May 22, 2024.


  1. octane

    octane New Member Full Member

    24
    34
    Mar 9, 2019
    Why cant Usyk defend the IBF or get a chance to rather than being stripped.
    Is there a cutoff date for defending the belt and too soon for him to get back in the ring to do so.

    He has earned and worked hard to get where he has just for it to be ripped away due to politics.
    Surley the mandatory fights the holder of it...just dont get it TBH
     
  2. ChiefGego

    ChiefGego Active Member Full Member

    932
    1,061
    Jul 22, 2022
    Wasn't the mandatory for IBF Hrgovic who had a fight lined up for himself already anyway? It's just politics, more champs = more sellable fights happening = more money :// This is a very corrupt sport but nobody is surprised
     
    Badbot and lordlosh like this.
  3. CroBox29

    CroBox29 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,102
    7,144
    Nov 24, 2019
    It seems that the belt remains in his collection, politics does not care about someone's work and effort, but when it comes to the champion, they will make an exception...
     
  4. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,410
    29,754
    Apr 4, 2005
    Unfortunately that's the nature of the game, if Hrgovic ever finds himself in Usyk's position he'll no doubt be able to make exceptions too.

    In an ideal sport, the champions would fight more than once or twice per year and mandatories would then get their shots sooner but now we have mandatories waiting years to get their mandatory shot. Sucks but it is what it is.
     
    CroBox29 likes this.
  5. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,376
    11,879
    Apr 19, 2010
    So many newbies on here of late
     
  6. DarrenO

    DarrenO New Member Full Member

    33
    43
    May 9, 2024
    Why is having newbies an issue?
    Newbies enjoy finding out more about the sport. Every day is a school day.
     
    octane likes this.
  7. darkostazic1

    darkostazic1 New Member banned Full Member

    32
    35
    May 22, 2024
    He refuses to defend, but now IBF president said he doesnt even have to defend.
     
    CroBox29 likes this.
  8. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,332
    12,773
    May 8, 2014
    The longer the HW title stays whole, the better it is for boxing. Ideally there should only be one champion per division.
     
    octane likes this.
  9. octane

    octane New Member Full Member

    24
    34
    Mar 9, 2019
    Cheers for that, legit question but didnt realise it would trigger Ashishwarrior but Ashish'keyboard'warrior would be more fitting ;)
     
  10. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,384
    5,296
    Feb 10, 2020
    In theory yes, but as I said on another thread, the champion not fighting mandatories is not good for the long-term health of boxing. For example, Jalalov was the star of the Tokyo 2021 Olympics, and people are questioning why he is not committing to the pro game. But why would the stars or the tomorrow even bother, when they see an undefeated Olympian from 2016, Hrgovic, continuously being frozen out of the picture. It's been 8 years since that Olympics, and 8 years since the 2012 mob got their first title shots. So what incentive is there for the top Olympians if they are not from US or UK to turn over?

    At this rate, Olympic Gold Medalist, Jalolov, might get a title shot in what...2030? aged: 35
     
    kriszhao likes this.
  11. ChiefGego

    ChiefGego Active Member Full Member

    932
    1,061
    Jul 22, 2022
    Work and effort wouldn't be fighting a contender for a vacant. Fight a champ for a real belt
     
    octane likes this.