walcott vs quarry....

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, May 1, 2009.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Doesn't the highlighted bit imply that they may be wrong in their assessment of how well Foreman would do against the 50's heavyweights, given that an aging Ali beat Foreman easily?
     
  2. ray fredrickson

    ray fredrickson Member Full Member

    470
    0
    Jan 7, 2009
    Quarry had enuogh skill beat Lyle & foster!!:lol:Jersey Joe no world beater either!! Good fight.:happy
     
  3. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    well NO, they knew that version of Ali had lost to fighters Foreman had murdered in 2 rounds i.e. frazier, norton. So they thought ali had NO CHANCE against foremen. Woulda been a different story if Foreman was fighting a 1967 Ali who was UNDEFEATED! Moore & Sadler wouldn't have been laughing so much :)
     
  4. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,957
    853
    Nov 23, 2007
    Joe by late tko or decision
     
  5. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    20
    Sep 17, 2007
    Jersey Joe had an inconsistent record. He did very well against many top guys --- after all he became the HW champ --- but lost to some average ones too.

    Jerry had two styles. He was a great counter puncher and when he wanted to, he could be a very good rock 'em sock 'em sort of banger. I would not define him as a swarmer in the strictest sense of the term. He used his banger style to give Patterson and Thad Spencer fits and also to knock out Shavers early. He used his counter punching style to beat Ron Lyle and Mac Foster - big fighters who could hit hard but were rather slow.

    A fight between Joe Walcott and Jerry Quarry in their respective primes would be very competitive. IMO, Walcott at his best would beat Quarry. Either by decision or late stoppage.
     
  6. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,632
    345
    Apr 18, 2007
    Jersey Joe would win this one with his head. Punching power, size and strength did nothing to intimidate Quarry. Highly skilled boxers with speed like Machen, Patterson, Ellis and Ali gave him fits though. Jerry would not be suckering Walcott into the corners for counterpunching. Although Quarry could be stopped on cuts, I think that Joe would simply outmaneuver and outbox Quarry from long range, and neutralize him in close. It comes down to who can induce the other to come forward and make the fight, and Walcott is much the better ring general in that respect.
     
  7. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Duodenum, long time no see, my old nemesis when it comes to discussing Holmes, Foreman and Dempsey. :happy
     
  8. markedwardscott

    markedwardscott Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    4
    Apr 6, 2007