Was Paulie Robbed?

Broner clearly won. Had it wider than 115-113.

 

I would not say he was robbed, he was right in his assumption that it was a close fight and could have gone 115-113 or 114-114 but he was also right in his comment that the 117 scorecard was a total nonsense.

That card has to be either total incompetence or someone who had made there mind up before the fight started who they thought would win.

You can draw your own conclusions as to why that should be so but I am a huge Broner fan and there is no way on gods earth that he scored 117 in that fight.

 

That's why I said I had it wider than 115-113. :nut

 

Wasn't a robbery but this is the 3rd close fight that could have gone against Broner that didn't he will never be allowed to lose a close decision.

 

i had malignaggi winning by a round , draw probably was fair

it was what you liked really , paulies constant activity and making broner miss......or broners 4 punches a round he would land with

 

LOL, biggest robbery since 1989, when Whitaker was gifted all them decisions; as he and many others claimed he did not lose a round the entire year...

 

Poor judging again and you wonder why Ricky Burns never took the fight at 7 weeks notice!
I've no doubt Ricky can beat Broner but not the 3 judges,people give our refs and judges a hard time for the occasional poor decision but in the state it's more regular than anywhere.

 

The judge who gave it by 6 rounds should be struck off

 

You must literally be the only person on the planet who believes Ricky would win.

 

i had 4 clear rounds to paulie 2 for broner and the rest could of gone either way. don't know about robbed but he definitely got a kick in the nuts

 

Broner won without breaking sweat and it is probably the easiest pay day he will earn.

1.5m dollars for no risk

 

Get it on at the end of the year then

No excuses