Which KO was better?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kosaros, May 21, 2012.


  1. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGHwfQLsbn0[/ame]


    Or

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAAd0DrOMDY[/ame]


    :yep
     
  2. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Bloody hell. Remarkably similar in the way the victims fell into the punch and to the ground.
     
  3. kwilson71

    kwilson71 #MAYDAY Full Member

    3,858
    0
    Feb 28, 2012
    My thoughts exactly
     
  4. gr33nfather

    gr33nfather Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,188
    4
    Sep 27, 2008
    the Hatton fight was better because the quality of the image is better
     
  5. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,047
    2,856
    Nov 6, 2011
    I like the way no one throws a punch for about 13 seconds in the second fight.
    As for which KO was better? Don't really care as I'm still amazed that they are virtually the same in every way
     
  6. youngrell

    youngrell New Member Full Member

    4
    0
    Oct 27, 2011
    What the hell was the Ref doing helping the fighter up off the canvas like that?

    Anyway, good find, they are so similar it's crazy!
     
  7. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
  8. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    The Hatton KO beause when you watch it (1) Pac man's punch is 2/3 times faster than Hatton's movement and (2) the entire momentum of the punch STOPS when it connects. All that force in a single point - wow!