why not demetrius?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Benjiabc, Dec 13, 2007.

  1. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    15
    reading many of the posts on here recently i have seen many people suggest that the only fights left for hatton to take are witter and malignaggi. does demetrius hopkins not deserve a shot? he is undefeated and of what i have seen looks a decent fighter? would hatton take the fight?
     
    Benjiabc, Dec 13, 2007
    #1
  2. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,693
    Likes Received:
    1
    He lost to Steve Forbes - get the **** out of here. :fire If B-Hop wasn't his uncle and the fight wasn't being promoted by GBP - he'll have a lost.

    Let him fight some more names - cause right now - he'll living off his last name.
     
    KayEpps, Dec 13, 2007
    #2
  3. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    15
    did not realise he had lost my apologies. thought he was undefeated.
     
    Benjiabc, Dec 13, 2007
    #3
  4. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    0
    100% Correct.
     
    shelterr, Dec 13, 2007
    #4
  5. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    15
    he beat steve forbes?:nut :?
     
    Benjiabc, Dec 13, 2007
    #5
  6. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    0
    Technically he is still undefeated, but anyone with two eyes knows he lost that fight.
     
    shelterr, Dec 13, 2007
    #6