Young Stribling P4P Ranking?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Feb 26, 2009.

  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,973
    Likes Received:
    13,342
    Does anyone here rank him at all?

    Corbett called him the "the best heavyweight fighter for his pounds that ever lived."

    Absolutely unbelievable record. 257 (128) - 15. And four of those losses were DQ's!

    Thoughts?
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,716
    Likes Received:
    30,650
    Didn't you put up a thread a while back telling us Stribling was an ATG and a great puncher?
    Anyone wanting to evaluate Young William Lawrence ,needs to look closely at his record, it is more padded than a cell at an asylum.
     
  3. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,935
    Likes Received:
    100
    He had a record that many fighters would envy, but he wasn't one of the greats, mainly because he choked in his most important fights - Berlenbach, Sharkey, Schmeling - and despite being so experienced, he was made to look surprisngly amateurish at times. And as mcvey said, his record is hugely padded, despite having some good wins here and there throughout it.
     
  4. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,935
    Likes Received:
    100
    If that's the same thread I'm thinking of, I think that was someone else.
     
  5. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,973
    Likes Received:
    13,342
    No. You think I'd be asking if I already had that belief?
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,716
    Likes Received:
    30,650
    Actually yes I do.
     
  7. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,973
    Likes Received:
    13,342
    You're wrong then, which isn't anything new.

    Enjoy. :thumbsup