Both of his pro losses were due to him showing low levels of aggression. Yea, it's cool to "download" information. Maybe for a round, give away the first round if you must. But in a close fight even the 1st round can be critical. Maybe its muscle memory from 400 amatuer fights. They dont score aggression in the amateurs. They do in the pros. Maybe he just cant override all those years of tapping the opponent for points in the amateurs. When he lost to Salido in 2nd pro fight that was supposed to be his wake up call that this is no longer amatuer. But then he did the same thing years later against Lopez when he showed low aggression. If he is to beat Lopez in a rematch he must show improved aggression.
Lol. Salido won off a blind ref, fouls and low blows. Loma’s “aggression” wouldn’t have helped unless he could hulk rage into Mike Tyson for a round, which he can’t. As for Lopez, what part of shoulder surgery immediately after the fight was unclear? Yeah, one of the most decorated amateur careers ever with three hundred ninety six wins and one loss should develop “improved aggression” at thirty four years old. /Sarcasm. The boxer who has won multiple titles as fast as anyone in the sport is doing just fine and probably shouldn’t dramatically change at this point, rather just make small adjustments.
Loma's loss against Salido is just completely invalid due to the weight difference and the illegal bs he was doing throughout. In any sport governed by and actually enforced actual rules he would have been disqualified. Lomas loss against Lopez shouldn't have been a loss because he won rounds 2 and 6, they were just gifted to Lopez even though all he did was walk forward and land nothing and get outlanded. This is not to mention the huge size difference (something that is ignored as if it doesn't make a difference) and the fact Loma confirmed he was not throwing that hand for first 6 due to it being injured.
No one boxer needs respect from you nor to read any one from your " smart " posts. LOL. You did not had get better in posting during 7 years. I do know that for you boxers origin matters more than anything else.
Useless cliches and vague ideas... that’s all you have to offer. Cool, I’ll speak in a language you understand then... If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it. Everything happens for a reason. It is what it is. What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. People with beards are just people without beards but with beards. To summarize Goats are like mushrooms. If you shoot a duck, I’m scared of toasters.
yes. and the excuses regarding loma are much sillier than the accusations. you can "download" all the info you want, WHILE you are scoring points. go out there with a plan of more than just waiting to see what the other guys got. go out intent on putting the jab in his face, THEN study how he reacts to it and adjust from there. make all the excuses you want, mikey fought a better salido and made him look like a falling down drunk in the alley. thats how he dealt with that dirty problem.
Va-SILLY Lose-a-chenko the 2 time professional loser, son of Salido and son of a 22 year old inexperienced Two Lopez...
Lomachenko lost against Lopez. Get over it, he got outlanded in the early and mid rounds and lost the 12th
Nah, Loma has a very strong case for rounds 2 and 6 which the commentary no doubt swayed the viewer into thinking these were Lopez rounds. There's a reason Crawford and Ward had these rounds to Loma. I had 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 for Loma... 7 is a toss up too difficult to score
